* fix(challenge): rename challenge, change fields to properties, fix test
* fix(challenge): update challenge name in meta.json
* fix(challenge): update test and assertion message
* fix(challenge): update second assert message
* fix(challenge): remove the word Person from text
* fix: convert js algorithms and data structures
* fix: revert some blocks back to blockquote
* fix: reverted comparison code block to blockquotes
* fix: change js to json
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* fix: convert various section to triple backticks
* fix: Make the formatting consistent for comparisons
* fix: reworded and moved challenge
* fix: removed extra line
Co-Authored-By: RandellDawson <5313213+RandellDawson@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix; removed extra line
Co-Authored-By: RandellDawson <5313213+RandellDawson@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: reworded sentence
Co-Authored-By: RandellDawson <5313213+RandellDawson@users.noreply.github.com>
* Edit Instructions Text To Make Goal Clearer
The instructions end with "using the object provided" which is unclear since the user is expected to create their own name for the object. Users may think they need to reference an object name and be confused when they do not find it. Reiterating that the user needs to create the name for the object themselves makes the task clearer.
* Updated commit based on comments
* Update use-arrow-functions-to-write-concise-anonymous-functions.english.md
* refactor: fix the assert messages to make them more like all the rest in the curriculum (i.e. using `should`)
Co-Authored-By: iliyaZelenko <iliyazelenkog@gmail.com>
* Fix(Curriculum): Constructor function not explained before ES6 #17865
* Update curriculum/challenges/english/02-javascript-algorithms-and-data-structures/es6/use-class-syntax-to-define-a-constructor-function.english.md
Co-Authored-By: hilliarj <hilliarj@dickinson.edu>
* Update to #17865 PR
Fix(Curriculum): Constructor function not explained before ES6. Used an unordered list and the syntax that others recommended.
* fix/update-es6-destructor-challenge: Added test
- Added test incase during destructuring somebody pass and extra key
* fix/update-es6-destructor-challenge: Fixed the test case per review comments
-Cleaned up regex
- Setup two cases one where additional assignment of variables before and then after
- Did not put uppercase case CONSTANT checks because not related to question
* fix: corrected tests
* fix(coding): uncomment destructuring test and add solution
the test that ensured destructuring was being used had been left commented out and there was no solution offered. I uncommented the test and verified it worked as well as added the solution.
* fix: corrected partial solution to full
* fix: update text of Write Higher Order Arrow to be more instructive
* fix: update tests and code to be more simple. Edit typos in text part. Prepare for PR
* fix: further changes to PR
* fix: checkout old head. Merge later commit with older commits
* fix: add MDN links to arrow-functions guide
* fix: re-add removed log and change working in guide wording
* Update curriculum/challenges/english/02-javascript-algorithms-and-data-structures/es6/write-higher-order-arrow-functions.english.md
Yep
Co-Authored-By: chrisdel101 <arssonist@yahoo.com>
* Update curriculum/challenges/english/02-javascript-algorithms-and-data-structures/es6/write-higher-order-arrow-functions.english.md
Removing unneeded line for clarity
Co-Authored-By: chrisdel101 <arssonist@yahoo.com>
* Update: Added info re uppercase and lowercase
Included information to explain that lowercase and camelCase can be used for const identifiers.
* Fix: corrected mutable to immutable
I corrected the error that uppercase is used for mutable values.
* Fix: changed ** ** to <strong></strong>
I changed the markdown ** ** to <strong></strong>, as I was informed that ** didin't work.
