* fix(learn): update instructions
edited text - change "returns a random number" to "returns a random whole number" to be more clear on the problem statement.
Address review comments : add the keyword "whole" to description, to make it consistent with challenge title and Instructions.
* add: test to return early pattern
Currently no test for a = 0 or b = 0. This results in if(a<=0 || b<= 0) also being a valid solution
* fix: typo in test text
* fix: update return early pattern test
Co-authored-by: Shaun Hamilton <51722130+Sky020@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shaun Hamilton <51722130+Sky020@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fixed typo "in the left" should be "at the left"
* Update curriculum/challenges/english/02-javascript-algorithms-and-data-structures/basic-javascript/comparison-with-the-equality-operator.english.md
Co-Authored-By: Shaun Hamilton <51722130+Sky020@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shaun Hamilton <51722130+Sky020@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: remove example code from challenge seed
* fix: remove declaration from solution
* fix: added sum variable back in
* fix: reverted description back to original version
* fix: added examples to description section
* fix: added complete sentence
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* fix: corrected typo
Co-Authored-By: Manish Giri <manish.giri.me@gmail.com>
* fix: reverted to original desc with formatted code
* fix: removed unnecessary code example from description section
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* fix: failiing test on iterate through array with for loop
* fix: changed to Only change this line
Co-Authored-By: Manish Giri <manish.giri.me@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Manish Giri <manish.giri.me@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: moT01 <tmondloch01@gmail.com>
* Stronger test cases for testing objects for properties
Change function signature to take in a custom object to be tested
* YML formatting mistake
* Yaml no space in string
* Small one more fix - most likely final
* REmove double space in return
* Update instruction Section
* fix: consolidate/remove comments
* fix: remove => from comment
* fix: reverted changes to add same changes to another PR
* fix: removed 'the' from sentence
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* fix: removed 'the' from the sentence
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* fix: Correct paths in English exercises by prefixing "/" before "learn"
* fix(lang): Correct paths to exercises by prefixing "/" before "learn" in remaining languages
* Update escape-sequences-in-strings.english.md
Fixed minor grammar issue in list item 1 of the description section.
* Update curriculum/challenges/english/02-javascript-algorithms-and-data-structures/basic-javascript/escape-sequences-in-strings.english.md
Co-Authored-By: Randell Dawson <5313213+RandellDawson@users.noreply.github.com>
* Switch statement example updated
* Update switch-statements.english.md example
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* Update switch-statements.english.md example
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com>
* edited description to be a little more clear on how to access elements in an array through indeces
* Update curriculum/challenges/english/02-javascript-algorithms-and-data-structures/basic-javascript/access-array-data-with-indexes.english.md
Co-Authored-By: Tom <20648924+moT01@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: rewrite Iterate with JavaScript While Loops challenge
Previous example in the challenge description was the exact code
that challenge instructions say to implement. Change the challenge to
differentiate from the example.
resolvefreeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp#37694
* fix: update iterate with javascript while loops solution
* refactor: improve iterate with js while loops challenge wording
Co-Authored-By: Randell Dawson <5313213+RandellDawson@users.noreply.github.com>
* update test wording for undefined fn returns, bring code out of after test section and check that the function does what it says it does (rather than just checking the result), update seed, example, and solution
* Squashed the removal of the before test section
* fix: changed blockquote triple backtick syntax
* fix: removed recursion explanation
* fix: changed meta title and thru to through
* fix: capitalize "after" in several strings
