1
through the number passed to the function.
As mentioned in the previous challenge, there will be a base case. The base case tells the recursive function when it no longer needs to call itself. It is a simple case where the return value is already known. There will also be a recursive call which executes the original function with different arguments. If the function is written correctly, eventually the base case will be reached.
For example, say you want to write a recursive function that returns an array containing the numbers 1
through n
. This function will need to accept an argument, n
, representing the final number. Then it will need to call itself with progressively smaller values of n
until it reaches 1
. You could write the function as follows:
```javascript
function countup(n) {
if (n < 1) {
return [];
} else {
const countArray = countup(n - 1);
countArray.push(n);
return countArray;
}
}
console.log(countup(5)); // [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
```
At first, this seems counterintuitive since the value of `n` decreases, but the values in the final array are increasing. This happens because the push happens last, after the recursive call has returned. At the point where `n` is pushed into the array, `countup(n - 1)` has already been evaluated and returned `[1, 2, ..., n - 1]`.
countdown
with one parameter (n
). The function should use recursion to return an array containing the integers n
through 1
based on the n
parameter. If the function is called with a number less than 1, the function should return an empty array.
For example, calling this function with n = 5
should return the array [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
.
Your function must use recursion by calling itself and must not use loops of any kind.
countdown(-1)
should return an empty array.
testString: assert.isEmpty(countdown(-1));
- text: countdown(10)
should return [10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
testString: assert.deepStrictEqual(countdown(10), [10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]);
- text: countdown(5)
should return [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
testString: assert.deepStrictEqual(countdown(5), [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]);
- text: Your code should not rely on any kind of loops (for
, while
or higher order functions such as forEach
, map
, filter
, and reduce
).
testString: assert(!__helpers.removeJSComments(code).match(/for|while|forEach|map|filter|reduce/g));
- text: You should use recursion to solve this problem.
testString: assert(__helpers.removeJSComments(countdown.toString()).match(/countdown\s*\(.+\)/));
```