core: use a wrapped map to remove contention in TxPool.Get
. (#16670)
* core: use a wrapped `map` and `sync.RWMutex` for `TxPool.all` to remove contention in `TxPool.Get`. * core: Remove redundant `txLookup.Find` and improve comments on txLookup methods.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Péter Szilágyi
parent
be22ee8dda
commit
55b579e02c
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ func validateTxPoolInternals(pool *TxPool) error {
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the total transaction set is consistent with pending + queued
|
||||
pending, queued := pool.stats()
|
||||
if total := len(pool.all); total != pending+queued {
|
||||
if total := pool.all.Count(); total != pending+queued {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("total transaction count %d != %d pending + %d queued", total, pending, queued)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if priced := pool.priced.items.Len() - pool.priced.stales; priced != pending+queued {
|
||||
@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ func TestTransactionDoubleNonce(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("transaction mismatch: have %x, want %x", tx.Hash(), tx2.Hash())
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Ensure the total transaction count is correct
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Error("expected 1 total transactions, got", len(pool.all))
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != 1 {
|
||||
t.Error("expected 1 total transactions, got", pool.all.Count())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -424,8 +424,8 @@ func TestTransactionMissingNonce(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if pool.queue[addr].Len() != 1 {
|
||||
t.Error("expected 1 queued transaction, got", pool.queue[addr].Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Error("expected 1 total transactions, got", len(pool.all))
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != 1 {
|
||||
t.Error("expected 1 total transactions, got", pool.all.Count())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -488,8 +488,8 @@ func TestTransactionDropping(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if pool.queue[account].Len() != 3 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("queued transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.queue[account].Len(), 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != 6 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), 6)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != 6 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), 6)
|
||||
}
|
||||
pool.lockedReset(nil, nil)
|
||||
if pool.pending[account].Len() != 3 {
|
||||
@ -498,8 +498,8 @@ func TestTransactionDropping(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if pool.queue[account].Len() != 3 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("queued transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.queue[account].Len(), 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != 6 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), 6)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != 6 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), 6)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Reduce the balance of the account, and check that invalidated transactions are dropped
|
||||
pool.currentState.AddBalance(account, big.NewInt(-650))
|
||||
@ -523,8 +523,8 @@ func TestTransactionDropping(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if _, ok := pool.queue[account].txs.items[tx12.Nonce()]; ok {
|
||||
t.Errorf("out-of-fund queued transaction present: %v", tx11)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != 4 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), 4)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != 4 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), 4)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Reduce the block gas limit, check that invalidated transactions are dropped
|
||||
pool.chain.(*testBlockChain).gasLimit = 100
|
||||
@ -542,8 +542,8 @@ func TestTransactionDropping(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if _, ok := pool.queue[account].txs.items[tx11.Nonce()]; ok {
|
||||
t.Errorf("over-gased queued transaction present: %v", tx11)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), 2)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != 2 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), 2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -596,8 +596,8 @@ func TestTransactionPostponing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if len(pool.queue) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("queued accounts mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.queue), 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != len(txs) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), len(txs))
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != len(txs) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), len(txs))
|
||||
}
|
||||
pool.lockedReset(nil, nil)
|
||||
if pending := pool.pending[accs[0]].Len() + pool.pending[accs[1]].Len(); pending != len(txs) {
|
||||
@ -606,8 +606,8 @@ func TestTransactionPostponing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if len(pool.queue) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("queued accounts mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.queue), 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != len(txs) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), len(txs))
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != len(txs) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), len(txs))
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Reduce the balance of the account, and check that transactions are reorganised
|
||||
for _, addr := range accs {
|
||||
@ -656,8 +656,8 @@ func TestTransactionPostponing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != len(txs)/2 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), len(txs)/2)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != len(txs)/2 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), len(txs)/2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ func TestTransactionQueueAccountLimiting(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != int(testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != int(testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -942,8 +942,8 @@ func TestTransactionPendingLimiting(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("tx %d: queue size mismatch: have %d, want %d", i, pool.queue[account].Len(), 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool.all) != int(testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue+5) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", len(pool.all), testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue+5)
|
||||
if pool.all.Count() != int(testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue+5) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction mismatch: have %d, want %d", pool.all.Count(), testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue+5)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := validateEvents(events, int(testTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue+5)); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("event firing failed: %v", err)
|
||||
@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ func testTransactionLimitingEquivalency(t *testing.T, origin uint64) {
|
||||
if len(pool1.queue) != len(pool2.queue) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("queued transaction count mismatch: one-by-one algo: %d, batch algo: %d", len(pool1.queue), len(pool2.queue))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(pool1.all) != len(pool2.all) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction count mismatch: one-by-one algo %d, batch algo %d", len(pool1.all), len(pool2.all))
|
||||
if pool1.all.Count() != pool2.all.Count() {
|
||||
t.Errorf("total transaction count mismatch: one-by-one algo %d, batch algo %d", pool1.all.Count(), pool2.all.Count())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := validateTxPoolInternals(pool1); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Errorf("pool 1 internal state corrupted: %v", err)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user