all: seperate consensus error and evm internal error (#20830)
* all: seperate consensus error and evm internal error There are actually two types of error will be returned when a tranaction/message call is executed: (a) consensus error (b) evm internal error. The former should be converted to a consensus issue, e.g. The sender doesn't enough asset to purchase the gas it specifies. The latter is allowed since evm itself is a blackbox and internal error is allowed to happen. This PR emphasizes the difference by introducing a executionResult structure. The evm error is embedded inside. So if any error returned, it indicates consensus issue happens. And also this PR improve the `EstimateGas` API to return the concrete revert reason if the transaction always fails * all: polish * accounts/abi/bind/backends: add tests * accounts/abi/bind/backends, internal: cleanup error message * all: address comments * core: fix lint * accounts, core, eth, internal: address comments * accounts, internal: resolve revert reason if possible * accounts, internal: address comments
This commit is contained in:
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ func TestPrestateTracerCreate2(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("failed to prepare transaction for tracing: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
st := core.NewStateTransition(evm, msg, new(core.GasPool).AddGas(tx.Gas()))
|
||||
if _, _, _, err = st.TransitionDb(); err != nil {
|
||||
if _, err = st.TransitionDb(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("failed to execute transaction: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Retrieve the trace result and compare against the etalon
|
||||
@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ func TestCallTracer(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("failed to prepare transaction for tracing: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
st := core.NewStateTransition(evm, msg, new(core.GasPool).AddGas(tx.Gas()))
|
||||
if _, _, _, err = st.TransitionDb(); err != nil {
|
||||
if _, err = st.TransitionDb(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("failed to execute transaction: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Retrieve the trace result and compare against the etalon
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user