gaspersic/go-ethereum
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

crypto/secp256k1: update to github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1 @ 9d560f9 (#3544)

Browse Source 
- Use defined constants instead of hard-coding their integer value.
- Allocate secp256k1 structs on the C stack instead of converting []byte
- Remove dead code
This commit is contained in:
Felix Lange
2017-01-12 21:29:11 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent 93077c98e4
commit e0ceeab0d1
79 changed files with 8242 additions and 2011 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

41
crypto/secp256k1/libsecp256k1/src/scalar_impl.h
View File

@@ -7,8 +7,6 @@
#ifndef _SECP256K1_SCALAR_IMPL_H_
#define _SECP256K1_SCALAR_IMPL_H_
#include <string.h>
#include "group.h"
#include "scalar.h"
@@ -16,7 +14,9 @@
#include "libsecp256k1-config.h"
#endif
#if defined(USE_SCALAR_4X64)
#if defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER)
#include "scalar_low_impl.h"
#elif defined(USE_SCALAR_4X64)
#include "scalar_4x64_impl.h"
#elif defined(USE_SCALAR_8X32)
#include "scalar_8x32_impl.h"
@@ -33,17 +33,37 @@ static void secp256k1_scalar_get_num(secp256k1_num *r, const secp256k1_scalar *a
/** secp256k1 curve order, see secp256k1_ecdsa_const_order_as_fe in ecdsa_impl.h */
static void secp256k1_scalar_order_get_num(secp256k1_num *r) {
#if defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER)
static const unsigned char order[32] = {
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER
};
#else
static const unsigned char order[32] = {
0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,
0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFF,0xFE,
0xBA,0xAE,0xDC,0xE6,0xAF,0x48,0xA0,0x3B,
0xBF,0xD2,0x5E,0x8C,0xD0,0x36,0x41,0x41
};
#endif
secp256k1_num_set_bin(r, order, 32);
}
#endif
static void secp256k1_scalar_inverse(secp256k1_scalar *r, const secp256k1_scalar *x) {
#if defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER)
int i;
*r = 0;
for (i = 0; i < EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER; i++)
if ((i * *x) % EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER == 1)
*r = i;
/* If this VERIFY_CHECK triggers we were given a noninvertible scalar (and thus
* have a composite group order; fix it in exhaustive_tests.c). */
VERIFY_CHECK(*r != 0);
}
#else
secp256k1_scalar *t;
int i;
/* First compute x ^ (2^N - 1) for some values of N. */
@@ -235,9 +255,9 @@ static void secp256k1_scalar_inverse(secp256k1_scalar *r, const secp256k1_scalar
}
SECP256K1_INLINE static int secp256k1_scalar_is_even(const secp256k1_scalar *a) {
/* d[0] is present and is the lowest word for all representations */
return !(a->d[0] & 1);
}
#endif
static void secp256k1_scalar_inverse_var(secp256k1_scalar *r, const secp256k1_scalar *x) {
#if defined(USE_SCALAR_INV_BUILTIN)
@@ -261,6 +281,18 @@ static void secp256k1_scalar_inverse_var(secp256k1_scalar *r, const secp256k1_sc
}
#ifdef USE_ENDOMORPHISM
#if defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER)
/**
* Find k1 and k2 given k, such that k1 + k2 * lambda == k mod n; unlike in the
* full case we don't bother making k1 and k2 be small, we just want them to be
* nontrivial to get full test coverage for the exhaustive tests. We therefore
* (arbitrarily) set k2 = k + 5 and k1 = k - k2 * lambda.
*/
static void secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda(secp256k1_scalar *r1, secp256k1_scalar *r2, const secp256k1_scalar *a) {
*r2 = (*a + 5) % EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER;
*r1 = (*a + (EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER - *r2) * EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_LAMBDA) % EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER;
}
#else
/**
* The Secp256k1 curve has an endomorphism, where lambda * (x, y) = (beta * x, y), where
* lambda is {0x53,0x63,0xad,0x4c,0xc0,0x5c,0x30,0xe0,0xa5,0x26,0x1c,0x02,0x88,0x12,0x64,0x5a,
@@ -333,5 +365,6 @@ static void secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda(secp256k1_scalar *r1, secp256k1_scalar
secp256k1_scalar_add(r1, r1, a);
}
#endif
#endif
#endif