core/state/snapshot: implement iterator priority for fast direct data lookup
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Péter Szilágyi
parent
e567675473
commit
e570835356
@ -24,20 +24,27 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
type weightedIterator struct {
|
||||
it AccountIterator
|
||||
priority int
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// fastAccountIterator is a more optimized multi-layer iterator which maintains a
|
||||
// direct mapping of all iterators leading down to the bottom layer
|
||||
type fastAccountIterator struct {
|
||||
iterators []AccountIterator
|
||||
iterators []*weightedIterator
|
||||
initiated bool
|
||||
fail error
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The fast iterator does not query parents as much.
|
||||
// newFastAccountIterator creates a new fastAccountIterator
|
||||
func (dl *diffLayer) newFastAccountIterator() AccountIterator {
|
||||
f := &fastAccountIterator{
|
||||
iterators: dl.iterators(),
|
||||
initiated: false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
for i, it := range dl.iterators() {
|
||||
f.iterators = append(f.iterators, &weightedIterator{it, -i})
|
||||
}
|
||||
f.Seek(common.Hash{})
|
||||
return f
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -49,9 +56,17 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Len() int {
|
||||
|
||||
// Less implements sort.Interface
|
||||
func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Less(i, j int) bool {
|
||||
a := fi.iterators[i].Key()
|
||||
b := fi.iterators[j].Key()
|
||||
return bytes.Compare(a[:], b[:]) < 0
|
||||
a := fi.iterators[i].it.Key()
|
||||
b := fi.iterators[j].it.Key()
|
||||
bDiff := bytes.Compare(a[:], b[:])
|
||||
if bDiff < 0 {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bDiff > 0 {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
// keys are equal, sort by iterator priority
|
||||
return fi.iterators[i].priority < fi.iterators[j].priority
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Swap implements sort.Interface
|
||||
@ -61,23 +76,42 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Swap(i, j int) {
|
||||
|
||||
func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Seek(key common.Hash) {
|
||||
// We need to apply this across all iterators
|
||||
var seen = make(map[common.Hash]struct{})
|
||||
var seen = make(map[common.Hash]int)
|
||||
|
||||
length := len(fi.iterators)
|
||||
for i, it := range fi.iterators {
|
||||
it.Seek(key)
|
||||
for i := 0; i < len(fi.iterators); i++ {
|
||||
//for i, it := range fi.iterators {
|
||||
it := fi.iterators[i]
|
||||
it.it.Seek(key)
|
||||
for {
|
||||
if !it.Next() {
|
||||
if !it.it.Next() {
|
||||
// To be removed
|
||||
// swap it to the last position for now
|
||||
fi.iterators[i], fi.iterators[length-1] = fi.iterators[length-1], fi.iterators[i]
|
||||
length--
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
v := it.Key()
|
||||
if _, exist := seen[v]; !exist {
|
||||
seen[v] = struct{}{}
|
||||
v := it.it.Key()
|
||||
if other, exist := seen[v]; !exist {
|
||||
seen[v] = i
|
||||
break
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// This whole else-block can be avoided, if we instead
|
||||
// do an inital priority-sort of the iterators. If we do that,
|
||||
// then we'll only wind up here if a lower-priority (preferred) iterator
|
||||
// has the same value, and then we will always just continue.
|
||||
// However, it costs an extra sort, so it's probably not better
|
||||
|
||||
// One needs to be progressed, use priority to determine which
|
||||
if fi.iterators[other].priority < it.priority {
|
||||
// the 'it' should be progressed
|
||||
continue
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// the 'other' should be progressed - swap them
|
||||
it = fi.iterators[other]
|
||||
fi.iterators[other], fi.iterators[i] = fi.iterators[i], fi.iterators[other]
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -110,7 +144,7 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Next() bool {
|
||||
// innerNext(3), which will call Next on elem 3 (the second '5'). It will continue
|
||||
// along the list and apply the same operation if needed
|
||||
func (fi *fastAccountIterator) innerNext(pos int) bool {
|
||||
if !fi.iterators[pos].Next() {
|
||||
if !fi.iterators[pos].it.Next() {
|
||||
//Exhausted, remove this iterator
|
||||
fi.remove(pos)
|
||||
if len(fi.iterators) == 0 {
|
||||
@ -123,23 +157,23 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) innerNext(pos int) bool {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We next:ed the elem at 'pos'. Now we may have to re-sort that elem
|
||||
val, neighbour := fi.iterators[pos].Key(), fi.iterators[pos+1].Key()
|
||||
diff := bytes.Compare(val[:], neighbour[:])
|
||||
if diff < 0 {
|
||||
var (
|
||||
current, neighbour = fi.iterators[pos], fi.iterators[pos+1]
|
||||
val, neighbourVal = current.it.Key(), neighbour.it.Key()
|
||||
)
|
||||
if diff := bytes.Compare(val[:], neighbourVal[:]); diff < 0 {
|
||||
// It is still in correct place
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
if diff == 0 {
|
||||
// It has same value as the neighbour. So still in correct place, but
|
||||
// we need to iterate on the neighbour
|
||||
} else if diff == 0 && current.priority < neighbour.priority {
|
||||
// So still in correct place, but we need to iterate on the neighbour
|
||||
fi.innerNext(pos + 1)
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
// At this point, the elem is in the wrong location, but the
|
||||
// remaining list is sorted. Find out where to move the elem
|
||||
iterationNeeded := false
|
||||
iteratee := -1
|
||||
index := sort.Search(len(fi.iterators), func(n int) bool {
|
||||
if n <= pos {
|
||||
if n < pos {
|
||||
// No need to search 'behind' us
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -147,18 +181,29 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) innerNext(pos int) bool {
|
||||
// Can always place an elem last
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
neighbour := fi.iterators[n+1].Key()
|
||||
diff := bytes.Compare(val[:], neighbour[:])
|
||||
if diff == 0 {
|
||||
// The elem we're placing it next to has the same value,
|
||||
// so it's going to need further iteration
|
||||
iterationNeeded = true
|
||||
neighbour := fi.iterators[n+1].it.Key()
|
||||
if diff := bytes.Compare(val[:], neighbour[:]); diff < 0 {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
} else if diff > 0 {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
return diff < 0
|
||||
// The elem we're placing it next to has the same value,
|
||||
// so whichever winds up on n+1 will need further iteraton
|
||||
iteratee = n + 1
|
||||
if current.priority < fi.iterators[n+1].priority {
|
||||
// We can drop the iterator here
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We need to move it one step further
|
||||
return false
|
||||
// TODO benchmark which is best, this works too:
|
||||
//iteratee = n
|
||||
//return true
|
||||
// Doing so should finish the current search earlier
|
||||
})
|
||||
fi.move(pos, index)
|
||||
if iterationNeeded {
|
||||
fi.innerNext(index)
|
||||
if iteratee != -1 {
|
||||
fi.innerNext(iteratee)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -171,7 +216,7 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) move(index, newpos int) {
|
||||
var (
|
||||
elem = fi.iterators[index]
|
||||
middle = fi.iterators[index+1 : newpos+1]
|
||||
suffix []AccountIterator
|
||||
suffix []*weightedIterator
|
||||
)
|
||||
if newpos < len(fi.iterators)-1 {
|
||||
suffix = fi.iterators[newpos+1:]
|
||||
@ -194,18 +239,18 @@ func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Error() error {
|
||||
|
||||
// Key returns the current key
|
||||
func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Key() common.Hash {
|
||||
return fi.iterators[0].Key()
|
||||
return fi.iterators[0].it.Key()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Value returns the current key
|
||||
func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Value() []byte {
|
||||
panic("todo")
|
||||
return fi.iterators[0].it.Value()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Debug is a convencience helper during testing
|
||||
func (fi *fastAccountIterator) Debug() {
|
||||
for _, it := range fi.iterators {
|
||||
fmt.Printf(" %v ", it.Key()[31])
|
||||
fmt.Printf("[p=%v v=%v] ", it.priority, it.it.Key()[0])
|
||||
}
|
||||
fmt.Println()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user