core/state/snapshot: implement iterator priority for fast direct data lookup
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Péter Szilágyi
parent
e567675473
commit
e570835356
@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ package snapshot
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"bytes"
|
||||
"encoding/binary"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"math/rand"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -95,9 +96,10 @@ func TestFastIteratorBasics(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
{9, 10}, {10, 13, 15, 16}},
|
||||
expKeys: []byte{0, 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16}},
|
||||
} {
|
||||
var iterators []AccountIterator
|
||||
for _, data := range tc.lists {
|
||||
iterators = append(iterators, newTestIterator(data...))
|
||||
var iterators []*weightedIterator
|
||||
for i, data := range tc.lists {
|
||||
it := newTestIterator(data...)
|
||||
iterators = append(iterators, &weightedIterator{it, i})
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
fi := &fastAccountIterator{
|
||||
@ -162,6 +164,69 @@ func TestIteratorTraversal(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
verifyIterator(t, 7, child.newFastAccountIterator())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestIteratorTraversalValues tests some multi-layer iteration, where we
|
||||
// also expect the correct values to show up
|
||||
func TestIteratorTraversalValues(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
var (
|
||||
storage = make(map[common.Hash]map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
a = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
b = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
c = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
d = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
e = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
f = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
g = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
h = make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
)
|
||||
// entries in multiple layers should only become output once
|
||||
for i := byte(2); i < 0xff; i++ {
|
||||
a[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 0, i))
|
||||
if i > 20 && i%2 == 0 {
|
||||
b[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 1, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if i%4 == 0 {
|
||||
c[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 2, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if i%7 == 0 {
|
||||
d[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 3, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if i%8 == 0 {
|
||||
e[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 4, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if i > 50 || i < 85 {
|
||||
f[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 5, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if i%64 == 0 {
|
||||
g[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 6, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if i%128 == 0 {
|
||||
h[common.Hash{i}] = []byte(fmt.Sprintf("layer-%d, key %d", 7, i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
child := newDiffLayer(emptyLayer(), common.Hash{}, a, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, b, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, c, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, d, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, e, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, f, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, g, storage).
|
||||
Update(common.Hash{}, h, storage)
|
||||
|
||||
it := child.newFastAccountIterator()
|
||||
for it.Next() {
|
||||
key := it.Key()
|
||||
exp, err := child.accountRLP(key, 0)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
got := it.Value()
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(exp, got) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Error on key %x, got %v exp %v", key, string(got), string(exp))
|
||||
}
|
||||
//fmt.Printf("val: %v\n", string(it.Value()))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestIteratorLargeTraversal(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// This testcase is a bit notorious -- all layers contain the exact
|
||||
// same 200 accounts.
|
||||
@ -195,8 +260,14 @@ func TestIteratorLargeTraversal(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// same 200 accounts. That means that we need to process 2000 items, but only
|
||||
// spit out 200 values eventually.
|
||||
//
|
||||
//BenchmarkIteratorTraversal/binary_iterator-6 2008 573290 ns/op 9520 B/op 199 allocs/op
|
||||
//BenchmarkIteratorTraversal/fast_iterator-6 1946 575596 ns/op 20146 B/op 134 allocs/op
|
||||
// The value-fetching benchmark is easy on the binary iterator, since it never has to reach
|
||||
// down at any depth for retrieving the values -- all are on the toppmost layer
|
||||
//
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorTraversal/binary_iterator_keys-6 2239 483674 ns/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorTraversal/binary_iterator_values-6 2403 501810 ns/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorTraversal/fast_iterator_keys-6 1923 677966 ns/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorTraversal/fast_iterator_values-6 1741 649967 ns/op
|
||||
//
|
||||
func BenchmarkIteratorTraversal(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
|
||||
var storage = make(map[common.Hash]map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
@ -224,7 +295,7 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorTraversal(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
// We call this once before the benchmark, so the creation of
|
||||
// sorted accountlists are not included in the results.
|
||||
child.newBinaryAccountIterator()
|
||||
b.Run("binary iterator", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.Run("binary iterator keys", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newBinaryAccountIterator()
|
||||
@ -236,7 +307,20 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorTraversal(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
b.Run("fast iterator", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.Run("binary iterator values", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newBinaryAccountIterator()
|
||||
for it.Next() {
|
||||
got++
|
||||
child.accountRLP(it.Key(), 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if exp := 200; got != exp {
|
||||
b.Errorf("iterator len wrong, expected %d, got %d", exp, got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
b.Run("fast iterator keys", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newFastAccountIterator()
|
||||
@ -248,6 +332,19 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorTraversal(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
b.Run("fast iterator values", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newFastAccountIterator()
|
||||
for it.Next() {
|
||||
got++
|
||||
it.Value()
|
||||
}
|
||||
if exp := 200; got != exp {
|
||||
b.Errorf("iterator len wrong, expected %d, got %d", exp, got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer is a pretty realistic benchmark, where
|
||||
@ -256,8 +353,10 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorTraversal(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
// This is heavy on the binary iterator, which in most cases will have to
|
||||
// call recursively 100 times for the majority of the values
|
||||
//
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer/binary_iterator-6 585 2067377 ns/op 9520 B/op 199 allocs/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer/fast_iterator-6 13198 91043 ns/op 8601 B/op 118 allocs/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer/binary_iterator_(keys)-6 514 1971999 ns/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer/fast_iterator_(keys)-6 10000 114385 ns/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer/binary_iterator_(values)-6 61 18997492 ns/op
|
||||
// BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer/fast_iterator_(values)-6 4047 296823 ns/op
|
||||
func BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
var storage = make(map[common.Hash]map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -285,7 +384,7 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
// We call this once before the benchmark, so the creation of
|
||||
// sorted accountlists are not included in the results.
|
||||
child.newBinaryAccountIterator()
|
||||
b.Run("binary iterator", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.Run("binary iterator (keys)", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newBinaryAccountIterator()
|
||||
@ -297,7 +396,7 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
b.Run("fast iterator", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.Run("fast iterator (keys)", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newFastAccountIterator()
|
||||
@ -309,6 +408,34 @@ func BenchmarkIteratorLargeBaselayer(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
b.Run("binary iterator (values)", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newBinaryAccountIterator()
|
||||
for it.Next() {
|
||||
got++
|
||||
v := it.Key()
|
||||
child.accountRLP(v, -0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if exp := 2000; got != exp {
|
||||
b.Errorf("iterator len wrong, expected %d, got %d", exp, got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
b.Run("fast iterator (values)", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
got := 0
|
||||
it := child.newFastAccountIterator()
|
||||
for it.Next() {
|
||||
it.Value()
|
||||
got++
|
||||
}
|
||||
if exp := 2000; got != exp {
|
||||
b.Errorf("iterator len wrong, expected %d, got %d", exp, got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestIteratorFlatting tests what happens when we
|
||||
@ -394,3 +521,34 @@ func TestIteratorSeek(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
it.Seek(common.HexToHash("0xff"))
|
||||
verifyIterator(t, 0, it)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//BenchmarkIteratorSeek/init+seek-6 4328 245477 ns/op
|
||||
func BenchmarkIteratorSeek(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
|
||||
var storage = make(map[common.Hash]map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
mkAccounts := func(num int) map[common.Hash][]byte {
|
||||
accounts := make(map[common.Hash][]byte)
|
||||
for i := 0; i < num; i++ {
|
||||
h := common.Hash{}
|
||||
binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(h[:], uint64(i+1))
|
||||
accounts[h] = randomAccount()
|
||||
}
|
||||
return accounts
|
||||
}
|
||||
layer := newDiffLayer(emptyLayer(), common.Hash{}, mkAccounts(200), storage)
|
||||
for i := 1; i < 100; i++ {
|
||||
layer = layer.Update(common.Hash{},
|
||||
mkAccounts(200), storage)
|
||||
}
|
||||
b.Run("init+seek", func(b *testing.B) {
|
||||
b.ResetTimer()
|
||||
seekpos := make([]byte, 20)
|
||||
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
|
||||
b.StopTimer()
|
||||
rand.Read(seekpos)
|
||||
it := layer.newFastAccountIterator()
|
||||
b.StartTimer()
|
||||
it.Seek(common.BytesToHash(seekpos))
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user