Re-do rent collection check on rent-exempt account (#11349)
* wip: re-do rent collection check on rent-exempt account * Let's see how the ci goes * Restore previous code * Well, almost all new changes are revertable * Update doc * Add test and gating * Fix tests * Fix tests, especially avoid to change abi... * Fix more tests... * Fix snapshot restore * Align to _new_ with better uninitialized detection
This commit is contained in:
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ extern uint64_t entrypoint(const uint8_t *input) {
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].data_len == 100);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].is_signer);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].is_writable);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].rent_epoch == 1);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].rent_epoch == 0);
|
||||
sol_assert(!accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].executable);
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].data_len; i++) {
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].data[i] == i);
|
||||
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ extern uint64_t entrypoint(const uint8_t *input) {
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].data_len == 10);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].is_signer);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].is_writable);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].rent_epoch == 1);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].rent_epoch == 0);
|
||||
sol_assert(!accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].executable);
|
||||
|
||||
sol_assert(
|
||||
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ extern uint64_t entrypoint(const uint8_t *input) {
|
||||
&bpf_loader_id));
|
||||
sol_assert(!accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].is_signer);
|
||||
sol_assert(!accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].is_writable);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].rent_epoch == 1);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].rent_epoch == 0);
|
||||
sol_assert(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].executable);
|
||||
|
||||
sol_assert(SolPubkey_same(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user