Bump max invoke depth to 4 (#12742)
This commit is contained in:
@ -174,24 +174,6 @@ fn process_instruction(
|
||||
accounts,
|
||||
&[&[b"You pass butter", &[nonce1]]],
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let invoked_instruction = create_instruction(
|
||||
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
|
||||
&[
|
||||
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].key, true, false),
|
||||
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key, true, true),
|
||||
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].key, false, true),
|
||||
],
|
||||
vec![TEST_VERIFY_NESTED_SIGNERS],
|
||||
);
|
||||
invoke_signed(
|
||||
&invoked_instruction,
|
||||
accounts,
|
||||
&[
|
||||
&[b"Lil'", b"Bits", &[nonce2]],
|
||||
&[accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key.as_ref(), &[nonce3]],
|
||||
],
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
info!("Test readonly with writable account");
|
||||
@ -217,6 +199,8 @@ fn process_instruction(
|
||||
&[
|
||||
(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true),
|
||||
(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true),
|
||||
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
|
||||
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
|
||||
],
|
||||
vec![TEST_NESTED_INVOKE],
|
||||
);
|
||||
@ -224,9 +208,11 @@ fn process_instruction(
|
||||
info!("2nd invoke from first program");
|
||||
invoke(&instruction, accounts)?;
|
||||
|
||||
info!(line!(), 0, 0, 0, accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports());
|
||||
assert_eq!(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(), 42 - 5 + 1 + 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(), 10 + 5 - 1 - 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(), 42 - 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(),
|
||||
10 + 5 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
info!("Verify data values are retained and updated");
|
||||
|
@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
|
||||
//! @brief Example Rust-based BPF program that issues a cross-program-invocation
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::instruction::*;
|
||||
use solana_sdk::entrypoint;
|
||||
use solana_sdk::{
|
||||
account_info::AccountInfo, bpf_loader, entrypoint::ProgramResult, info, program::invoke,
|
||||
program_error::ProgramError, pubkey::Pubkey,
|
||||
account_info::AccountInfo,
|
||||
bpf_loader, entrypoint,
|
||||
entrypoint::ProgramResult,
|
||||
info,
|
||||
program::{invoke, invoke_signed},
|
||||
program_error::ProgramError,
|
||||
pubkey::Pubkey,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
entrypoint!(process_instruction);
|
||||
@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ fn process_instruction(
|
||||
}
|
||||
TEST_DERIVED_SIGNERS => {
|
||||
info!("verify derived signers");
|
||||
const INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX: usize = 0;
|
||||
const DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX: usize = 1;
|
||||
const DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX: usize = 2;
|
||||
const DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX: usize = 3;
|
||||
@ -112,6 +117,26 @@ fn process_instruction(
|
||||
assert!(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].is_signer);
|
||||
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].is_signer);
|
||||
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].is_signer);
|
||||
|
||||
let nonce2 = instruction_data[1];
|
||||
let nonce3 = instruction_data[2];
|
||||
let invoked_instruction = create_instruction(
|
||||
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
|
||||
&[
|
||||
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].key, true, false),
|
||||
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key, true, true),
|
||||
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].key, false, true),
|
||||
],
|
||||
vec![TEST_VERIFY_NESTED_SIGNERS],
|
||||
);
|
||||
invoke_signed(
|
||||
&invoked_instruction,
|
||||
accounts,
|
||||
&[
|
||||
&[b"Lil'", b"Bits", &[nonce2]],
|
||||
&[accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key.as_ref(), &[nonce3]],
|
||||
],
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TEST_VERIFY_NESTED_SIGNERS => {
|
||||
info!("verify nested derived signers");
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user