Bump max invoke depth to 4 (#12742)

This commit is contained in:
Jack May
2020-10-09 10:33:12 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3fedcdc6bc
commit 2cd7cd3149
9 changed files with 139 additions and 87 deletions

View File

@ -174,24 +174,6 @@ fn process_instruction(
accounts,
&[&[b"You pass butter", &[nonce1]]],
)?;
let invoked_instruction = create_instruction(
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
&[
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].key, true, false),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].key, false, true),
],
vec![TEST_VERIFY_NESTED_SIGNERS],
);
invoke_signed(
&invoked_instruction,
accounts,
&[
&[b"Lil'", b"Bits", &[nonce2]],
&[accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key.as_ref(), &[nonce3]],
],
)?;
}
info!("Test readonly with writable account");
@ -217,6 +199,8 @@ fn process_instruction(
&[
(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
],
vec![TEST_NESTED_INVOKE],
);
@ -224,9 +208,11 @@ fn process_instruction(
info!("2nd invoke from first program");
invoke(&instruction, accounts)?;
info!(line!(), 0, 0, 0, accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports());
assert_eq!(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(), 42 - 5 + 1 + 1);
assert_eq!(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(), 10 + 5 - 1 - 1);
assert_eq!(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(), 42 - 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1);
assert_eq!(
accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports(),
10 + 5 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1
);
}
info!("Verify data values are retained and updated");

View File

@ -1,10 +1,14 @@
//! @brief Example Rust-based BPF program that issues a cross-program-invocation
use crate::instruction::*;
use solana_sdk::entrypoint;
use solana_sdk::{
account_info::AccountInfo, bpf_loader, entrypoint::ProgramResult, info, program::invoke,
program_error::ProgramError, pubkey::Pubkey,
account_info::AccountInfo,
bpf_loader, entrypoint,
entrypoint::ProgramResult,
info,
program::{invoke, invoke_signed},
program_error::ProgramError,
pubkey::Pubkey,
};
entrypoint!(process_instruction);
@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ fn process_instruction(
}
TEST_DERIVED_SIGNERS => {
info!("verify derived signers");
const INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX: usize = 0;
const DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX: usize = 1;
const DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX: usize = 2;
const DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX: usize = 3;
@ -112,6 +117,26 @@ fn process_instruction(
assert!(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].is_signer);
let nonce2 = instruction_data[1];
let nonce3 = instruction_data[2];
let invoked_instruction = create_instruction(
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
&[
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].key, true, false),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].key, false, true),
],
vec![TEST_VERIFY_NESTED_SIGNERS],
);
invoke_signed(
&invoked_instruction,
accounts,
&[
&[b"Lil'", b"Bits", &[nonce2]],
&[accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key.as_ref(), &[nonce3]],
],
)?;
}
TEST_VERIFY_NESTED_SIGNERS => {
info!("verify nested derived signers");