From 39f2d346b8676b0ce844d603ea8b43a08b6857cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "mergify[bot]" <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:27:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo: epoch => slot... (#11573) (#11580) (cherry picked from commit 51e818ad64b705028fe74b2726e71e6b7178072f) Co-authored-by: Ryo Onodera --- docs/src/implemented-proposals/rent.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/src/implemented-proposals/rent.md b/docs/src/implemented-proposals/rent.md index 4e5fd57a05..d3d357a898 100644 --- a/docs/src/implemented-proposals/rent.md +++ b/docs/src/implemented-proposals/rent.md @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ On the contrary, rent collection isn't applied to accounts that are directly man - The distribution of rent collection itself (Otherwise, it may cause recursive rent collection handling) - The distribution of staking rewards at the start of every epoch (To reduce as much as processing spike at the start of new epoch) -- The distribution of transaction fee at the end of every epoch +- The distribution of transaction fee at the end of every slot Even if those processes are out of scope of rent collection, all of manipulated accounts will eventually be handled by the \(2\) mechanism.