Fix links for gitbook (#8948)

automerge
This commit is contained in:
Greg Fitzgerald
2020-03-18 17:45:15 -06:00
committed by GitHub
parent a70008cc5c
commit 42d7609d54

View File

@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ regenerate a keypair on demand.
In terms of convenience versus security, a paper wallet sits at the opposite In terms of convenience versus security, a paper wallet sits at the opposite
side of the spectrum from an FS wallet. It is terribly inconvenient to use, but side of the spectrum from an FS wallet. It is terribly inconvenient to use, but
offers excellent security. That high security is further amplified when paper offers excellent security. That high security is further amplified when paper
wallets are used in conjunction with [offline wallets are used in conjunction with
signing](../offline-signing/index.md). Custody services such as [Coinbase [offline signing](../offline-signing/index.md). Custody services such as
Custody](https://custody.coinbase.com/) use this combination. Paper wallets [Coinbase Custody](https://custody.coinbase.com/) use this combination. Paper wallets
and custody services are an excellent way to secure a large number of tokens and custody services are an excellent way to secure a large number of tokens
for a long period of time. for a long period of time.
@ -50,12 +50,13 @@ some interface for signing transactions.
### Hardware Wallet Security ### Hardware Wallet Security
A hardware wallet, such as the [Ledger hardware A hardware wallet, such as the
wallet](https://www.ledger.com/), offers a great blend of security and [Ledger hardware wallet](https://www.ledger.com/), offers a great blend of
convenience for cryptocurrencies. It effectively automates the process of security and convenience for cryptocurrencies. It effectively automates the
offline signing while retaining nearly all the convenience of an FS wallet. process of offline signing while retaining nearly all the convenience of an FS
In contrast to offline signing with paper wallets, which we regard as highly wallet. In contrast to offline signing with paper wallets, which we regard as
secure, offline signing with hardware wallets presents some security concerns: highly secure, offline signing with hardware wallets presents some security
concerns:
* Keys could be leaked by a malicious app on the hardware wallet * Keys could be leaked by a malicious app on the hardware wallet
* Keys could be stolen by a malicious client via a bug in the hardware wallet's * Keys could be stolen by a malicious client via a bug in the hardware wallet's
@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ To keep your hardware wallet tokens safe, we suggest:
## Which Wallet is Best? ## Which Wallet is Best?
Different people will have different needs, but if you are still unsure what's Different people will have different needs, but if you are still unsure what's
best for you after reading the comparisons above, go with a [Ledger Nano best for you after reading the comparisons above, go with a
S](https://shop.ledger.com/products/ledger-nano-s). The [Nano S is [Ledger Nano S](https://shop.ledger.com/products/ledger-nano-s). The
well-integrated into Solana's tool suite](../remote-wallet/ledger) and offers [Nano S is well-integrated into Solana's tool suite](../remote-wallet/ledger)
an outstanding blend of security and convenience. and offers an outstanding blend of security and convenience.