RPC sendTransaction now returns transaction logs on simulation failure

This commit is contained in:
Michael Vines
2020-09-15 22:30:04 -07:00
parent bb9c04895b
commit 749208fa32
2 changed files with 27 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ fn _send_transaction(
last_valid_slot: Slot,
) -> Result<String> {
if transaction.signatures.is_empty() {
return Err(RpcCustomError::SendTransactionIsNotSigned.into());
return Err(RpcCustomError::TransactionSignatureVerificationFailure.into());
}
let signature = transaction.signatures[0];
let transaction_info = TransactionInfo::new(signature, wire_transaction, last_valid_slot);
@@ -2158,26 +2158,18 @@ impl RpcSol for RpcSolImpl {
if !config.skip_preflight {
if transaction.verify().is_err() {
return Err(RpcCustomError::SendTransactionPreflightFailure {
message: "Transaction signature verification failed".into(),
}
.into());
return Err(RpcCustomError::TransactionSignatureVerificationFailure.into());
}
if meta.health.check() != RpcHealthStatus::Ok {
return Err(RpcCustomError::SendTransactionPreflightFailure {
message: "RPC node is unhealthy, unable to simulate transaction".into(),
}
.into());
return Err(RpcCustomError::RpcNodeUnhealthy.into());
}
let preflight_commitment = config
.preflight_commitment
.map(|commitment| CommitmentConfig { commitment });
let preflight_bank = &*meta.bank(preflight_commitment);
if let (Err(err), _log_output) =
preflight_bank.simulate_transaction(transaction.clone())
{
if let (Err(err), logs) = preflight_bank.simulate_transaction(transaction.clone()) {
// Note: it's possible that the transaction simulation failed but the actual
// transaction would succeed, such as when a transaction depends on an earlier
// transaction that has yet to reach max confirmations. In these cases the user
@@ -2185,6 +2177,10 @@ impl RpcSol for RpcSolImpl {
// additional controls over what bank is used for preflight should be exposed.
return Err(RpcCustomError::SendTransactionPreflightFailure {
message: format!("Transaction simulation failed: {}", err),
result: RpcSimulateTransactionResult {
err: Some(err),
logs: Some(logs),
},
}
.into());
}
@@ -4060,7 +4056,7 @@ pub mod tests {
assert_eq!(
res,
Some(
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32002,"message":"Transaction simulation failed: Blockhash not found"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32002,"message":"Transaction simulation failed: Blockhash not found","data":{"err":"BlockhashNotFound","logs":[]}},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
)
);
@@ -4076,7 +4072,7 @@ pub mod tests {
assert_eq!(
res,
Some(
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32002,"message":"Transaction simulation failed: Transaction failed to sanitize accounts offsets correctly"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32002,"message":"Transaction simulation failed: Transaction failed to sanitize accounts offsets correctly","data":{"err":"SanitizeFailure","logs":[]}},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
)
);
let mut bad_transaction =
@@ -4092,7 +4088,7 @@ pub mod tests {
assert_eq!(
res,
Some(
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32002,"message":"RPC node is unhealthy, unable to simulate transaction"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32005,"message":"RPC node is unhealthy"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
)
);
health.stub_set_health_status(None);
@@ -4108,7 +4104,7 @@ pub mod tests {
assert_eq!(
res,
Some(
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32002,"message":"Transaction signature verification failed"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32003,"message":"Transaction signature verification failure"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
)
);
@@ -4137,7 +4133,7 @@ pub mod tests {
assert_eq!(
res,
Some(
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32003,"message":"Transaction is not signed"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
r#"{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32003,"message":"Transaction signature verification failure"},"id":1}"#.to_string(),
)
);
}