Programs can only sign their accounts

This commit is contained in:
Jack May
2020-05-08 12:24:36 -07:00
parent b4b4d6b00d
commit 97e17f9b32
10 changed files with 187 additions and 100 deletions

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
extern crate solana_sdk;
use solana_bpf_rust_invoked::instruction::create_instruction;
use solana_bpf_rust_invoked::instruction::*;
use solana_sdk::{
account_info::AccountInfo,
entrypoint,
@ -21,8 +21,9 @@ const INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX: usize = 2;
const INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX: usize = 3;
const INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX: usize = 4;
// const ARGUMENT_DUP_INDEX: usize = 5;
const DERIVED_KEY_INDEX: usize = 6;
const DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX: usize = 6;
const DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX: usize = 7;
const DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX: usize = 8;
entrypoint!(process_instruction);
fn process_instruction(
@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ fn process_instruction(
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key, false, false),
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
],
vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
vec![TEST_VERIFY_TRANSLATIONS, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
);
invoke(&instruction, accounts)?;
}
@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ fn process_instruction(
let instruction = create_instruction(
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
&[(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true)],
vec![1],
vec![TEST_RETURN_ERROR],
);
assert_eq!(
invoke(&instruction, accounts),
@ -69,21 +70,24 @@ fn process_instruction(
info!("Test derived signers");
{
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].is_signer);
let invoked_instruction = create_instruction(
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
&[
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key, false, true),
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key, false, false),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY1_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].key, true, false),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY3_INDEX].key, false, false),
],
vec![2],
vec![TEST_DERIVED_SIGNERS],
);
invoke_signed(
&invoked_instruction,
accounts,
&[&["Lil'", "Bits"], &["Gar Ma Nar Nar"]],
&[&["You pass butter"], &["Lil'", "Bits"]],
)?;
}
@ -92,7 +96,7 @@ fn process_instruction(
let invoked_instruction = create_instruction(
*accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_INDEX].key,
&[(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, false, true)],
vec![3],
vec![TEST_VERIFY_WRITER],
);
invoke(&invoked_instruction, accounts)?;
}
@ -100,8 +104,6 @@ fn process_instruction(
info!("Test nested invoke");
{
assert!(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY_INDEX].is_signer);
assert!(!accounts[DERIVED_KEY2_INDEX].is_signer);
**accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports.borrow_mut() -= 5;
**accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].lamports.borrow_mut() += 5;
@ -112,11 +114,10 @@ fn process_instruction(
&[
(accounts[ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[INVOKED_ARGUMENT_INDEX].key, true, true),
(accounts[DERIVED_KEY_INDEX].key, true, false),
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
(accounts[INVOKED_PROGRAM_DUP_INDEX].key, false, false),
],
vec![4],
vec![TEST_NESTED_INVOKE],
);
invoke(&instruction, accounts)?;
info!("2nd invoke from first program");