gaspersic/solana
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tracks erasure coding shreds' indices explicitly (#21822) (#22094)

Browse Source 
The indices for erasure coding shreds are tied to data shreds:
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/90f41fd9b/ledger/src/shred.rs#L921

However with the upcoming changes to erasure schema, there will be more
erasure coding shreds than data shreds and we can no longer infer coding
shreds indices from data shreds.

The commit adds constructs to track coding shreds indices explicitly.

(cherry picked from commit 65d59f4ef0)

Co-authored-by: behzad nouri <behzadnouri@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
mergify[bot]
2021-12-23 19:38:50 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 8708186760
commit be0bcd85ed
14 changed files with 253 additions and 69 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
ledger/tests/shred.rs
View File

@ -48,7 +48,11 @@ fn test_multi_fec_block_coding() {
.collect();
let serialized_entries = bincode::serialize(&entries).unwrap();
let (data_shreds, coding_shreds) = shredder.entries_to_shreds(&keypair, &entries, true, 0);
let (data_shreds, coding_shreds) = shredder.entries_to_shreds(
&keypair, &entries, true, // is_last_in_slot
0, // next_shred_index
0, // next_code_index
);
let next_index = data_shreds.last().unwrap().index() + 1;
assert_eq!(next_index as usize, num_data_shreds);
assert_eq!(data_shreds.len(), num_data_shreds);
@ -218,8 +222,10 @@ fn setup_different_sized_fec_blocks(
let total_num_data_shreds: usize = 2 * num_shreds_per_iter;
for i in 0..2 {
let is_last = i == 1;
let (data_shreds, coding_shreds) =
shredder.entries_to_shreds(&keypair, &entries, is_last, next_index);
let (data_shreds, coding_shreds) = shredder.entries_to_shreds(
&keypair, &entries, is_last, next_index, // next_shred_index
next_index, // next_code_index
);
for shred in &data_shreds {
if (shred.index() as usize) == total_num_data_shreds - 1 {
assert!(shred.data_complete());