* Align host addresses
* support new program abi
* update epoch rollout
* Enforce aligned pointers in cross-program invocations
(cherry picked from commit 9290e561e1)
# Conflicts:
# programs/bpf_loader/src/lib.rs
Co-authored-by: Jack May <jack@solana.com>
* sdk: Make PubKey::create_program_address available in program unit tests (#11745)
* sdk: Make PubKey::create_program_address available in program unit tests
This finishes the work started in #11604 to have
`create_program_address` available when `target_arch` is not `bpf` and
`program` is enabled. Otherwise, there is an undefined reference error
to `sol_create_program_address`, which is only defined in `bpf`.
A small test to simply call the function has been added in order to catch
the problem in the future.
The default dependency to `solana-sdk/default` doesn't cause a problem with
existing programs since `build.sh` always specifies
`--no-default-features`, and programs in `solana-program-library` all
use it too.
* Add `default-features = false` for inter-program dependencies
Fix the build error found during CI. The `--no-default-features` flag
only applies to the top-level package, and not to dependencies. A program that
depends on another program, i.e. `128bit` which depends on `128bit_dep`,
must specify `default-features = false` when including that package,
otherwise the `bpf` build will try to pull in default packages, which
includes `std`.
(cherry picked from commit 9a366281d3)
# Conflicts:
# programs/bpf/rust/128bit/Cargo.toml
# programs/bpf/rust/invoke/Cargo.toml
# programs/bpf/rust/many_args/Cargo.toml
# programs/bpf/rust/param_passing/Cargo.toml
* Fix merge conflicts
Co-authored-by: Jon Cinque <jon.cinque@gmail.com>
* Force program address off the curve (#11323)
(cherry picked from commit 03263c850a)
* nudge
* trailing whitespace
Co-authored-by: Jack May <jack@solana.com>
Co-authored-by: Trent Nelson <trent@solana.com>
* Withdraw authority no longer implies a custodian
Before this change, if the withdraw authority and custodian had
the same public key, then a withdraw authority signature would
imply a custodian signature and lockup would be not be enforced.
After this change, the client's withdraw instruction must
explictly reference a custodian account in its optional sixth
account argument.
Likewise, the fee-payer no longer implies either a withdraw
authority or custodian.
* Fix test
The test was configuring the stake account with the fee-payer as
the withdraw authority, but then passing in a different key to
the withdraw instruction's withdraw authority parameter. It only
worked because the second transaction was signed by the fee-payer.
* fix rewards points (#10914)
* fix rewards points
* fixups
* * verify that we don't spend more in rewards than we've allocated for rewards
* purge f64s from calculations that could be done with integers
* test typical values
* simplify iteration over delegations some
* fixups
* Use try_from
* Add a comment for commission_split()
* Add assertion to detect inconsistent reward dist.
* Fix vote_balance_and_staked
* Don't overwrite accounts with stale copies
* Fix CI...
* Add tests for vote_balance_and_staked
* Add test for the determinism of update_rewards
* Revert "Don't overwrite accounts with stale copies"
This reverts commit 9886d085a6.
* Make stake_delegation_accounts to return hashmap
Co-authored-by: Ryo Onodera <ryoqun@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7cc2a6801b)
# Conflicts:
# runtime/src/serde_snapshot/tests.rs
* Fix conflict
Co-authored-by: Rob Walker <rwalker@rwalker.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryo Onodera <ryoqun@gmail.com>
* Fix hygiene issues in `declare_program!` and `declare_loader!`
The `declare_program!` and `declare_loader!` macros both expand to
new macro definitions (based on the `$name` argument). These 'inner'
macros make use of the special `$crate` metavariable to access items in
the crate where the 'inner' macros is defined.
However, this only works due to a bug in rustc. When a macro is
expanded, all `$crate` tokens in its output are 'marked' as being
resolved in the defining crate of that macro. An inner macro (including
the body of its arms) is 'just' another set of tokens that appears in
the body of the outer macro, so any `$crate` identifiers used there are
resolved relative to the 'outer' macro.
For example, consider the following code:
```rust
macro_rules! outer {
() => {
macro_rules! inner {
() => {
$crate::Foo
}
}
}
}
```
The path `$crate::Foo` will be resolved relative to the crate that defines `outer`,
**not** the crate which defines `inner`.
However, rustc currently loses this extra resolution information
(referred to as 'hygiene' information) when a crate is serialized.
In the above example, this means that the macro `inner` (which gets
defined in whatever crate invokes `outer!`) will behave differently
depending on which crate it is invoked from:
When `inner` is invoked from the same crate in which it is defined,
the hygiene information will still be available,
which will cause `$crate::Foo` to be resolved in the crate which defines 'outer'.
When `inner` is invoked from a different crate, it will be loaded from
the metadata of the crate which defines 'inner'. Since the hygiene
information is currently lost, rust will 'forget' that `$crate::Foo` is
supposed to be resolved in the context of 'outer'. Instead, it will be
resolved relative to the crate which defines 'inner', which can cause
incorrect code to compile.
This bug will soon be fixed in rust (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72121),
which will break `declare_program!` and `declare_loader!`. Fortunately,
it's possible to obtain the desired behavior (`$crate` resolving in the
context of the 'inner' macro) by use of a procedural macro.
This commit adds a `respan!` proc-macro to the `sdk/macro` crate.
Using the newly-stabilized (on Nightly) `Span::resolved_at` method,
the `$crate` identifier can be made to be resolved in the context of the
proper crate.
Since `Span::resolved_at` is only stable on the latest nightly,
referencing it on an earlier version of Rust will cause a compilation error.
This requires the `rustversion` crate to be used, which allows conditionally
compiling code epending on the Rust compiler version in use. Since this method is already
stabilized in the latest nightly, there will never be a situation where
the hygiene bug is fixed (e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72121)
is merged but we are unable to call `Span::resolved_at`.
(cherry picked from commit 05445c718e)
# Conflicts:
# Cargo.lock
# sdk/Cargo.toml
* Replace FIXME with an issue link
(cherry picked from commit b0cb2b0106)
* Update lock files
(cherry picked from commit 42f88484f4)
# Conflicts:
# programs/bpf/Cargo.lock
# programs/librapay/Cargo.lock
# programs/move_loader/Cargo.lock
* Split comment over multiple lines
Due to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4325, leaving this as
one line causes rustfmt to add extra indentation to the surrounding
code.
(cherry picked from commit fed69e96a9)
* Fix clippy lints
(cherry picked from commit e7387f60a7)
* Apply #![feature(proc_macro_hygiene)] when needed
This allows the rust-bpf-builder toolchain to build the sdk
(cherry picked from commit 95490ff56e)
# Conflicts:
# sdk/build.rs
# sdk/src/lib.rs
* Update Cargo.toml
* Update lib.rs
* Add rustc_version
* lock file updates
Co-authored-by: Aaron Hill <aa1ronham@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jack May <jack@solana.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Vines <mvines@gmail.com>
