[Triton-MLIR] Fix some typos (#874)

Fix some typos
This commit is contained in:
Chenggang Zhao
2022-11-14 10:15:53 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent f40c63fb03
commit 516a241234
16 changed files with 47 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ Scheduling languages are, without a doubt, one of the most popular approaches fo
Limitations
++++++++++++
This ease-of-development comes at a cost. First of all, existing systems that follow this paradigm tend to be noticeably slower than Triton on modern hardware when applicable (e.g., V100/A100 tensor cores w/ equal tile sizes). I do believe that this is not a fundamental issue of scheduling languages -- in the sense that it could probably be solved with more efforts -- but it could mean that these systems are harder to engineer. More importantly, existing scheduling languages generate loops whose bounds and increments cannot depend on surrounding loop indice without at least imposing severe constraints on possible schedules -- if not breaking the system entirely. This is problematic for sparse computations, whose iteration spaces may be irregular.
This ease-of-development comes at a cost. First of all, existing systems that follow this paradigm tend to be noticeably slower than Triton on modern hardware when applicable (e.g., V100/A100 tensor cores w/ equal tile sizes). I do believe that this is not a fundamental issue of scheduling languages -- in the sense that it could probably be solved with more efforts -- but it could mean that these systems are harder to engineer. More importantly, existing scheduling languages generate loops whose bounds and increments cannot depend on surrounding loop indices without at least imposing severe constraints on possible schedules -- if not breaking the system entirely. This is problematic for sparse computations, whose iteration spaces may be irregular.
.. table::
:widths: 50 50