Note
Click here to download the full example code
Matrix Multiplication¶
In this tutorial, you will write a 25-lines high-performance FP16 matrix multiplication kernel that achieves performance on par with cuBLAS. You will specifically learn about:
Block-level matrix multiplications
Multi-dimensional pointer arithmetic
Program re-ordering for improved L2 cache hit rate
Automatic performance tuning
Motivations¶
Matrix multiplications are a key building block of most modern high-performance computing systems. They are notoriously hard to optimize, hence their implementation is generally done by hardware vendors themselves as part of so-called “kernel libraries” (e.g., cuBLAS). Unfortunately, these libraries are often proprietary and cannot be easily customized to accomodate the needs of modern deep learning workloads (e.g., fused activation functions). In this tutorial, you will learn how to implement efficient matrix multiplications by yourself with Triton, in a way that is easy to customize and extend.
Roughly speaking, the kernel that we will write will implement the following blocked algorithm:
# do in parallel for m in range(0, M, BLOCK_M): # do in parallel for n in range(0, N, BLOCK_N): acc = zeros((BLOCK_M, BLOCK_N), dtype=float32) for k in range(0, K, BLOCK_K): a = A[m : m+BLOCK_M, k : k+BLOCK_K] b = B[k : k+BLOCK_K, n : n+BLOCK_N] acc += dot(a, b) C[m : m+BLOCK_M, n : n+BLOCK_N] = acc;
where each iteration of the doubly-nested for-loop corresponds to a Triton program instance.
Compute Kernel¶
The above algorithm is, actually, fairly straightforward to implement in Triton.
The main difficulty comes from the computation of the memory locations at which blocks of A and B must be read in the inner loop. For that, we need multi-dimensional pointer arithmetics.
Pointer Arithmetics¶
For a row-major 2D tensor X, the memory location of X[i, j] is given by &X[i, j] = X + i*stride_x_0 + j*stride_x_1.
Therefore, blocks of pointers for A[m : m+BLOCK_M, k:k+BLOCK_K] and B[k : k+BLOCK_K, n : n+BLOCK_N] can be defined in pseudo-code as:
&A[m : m+BLOCK_M, k:k+BLOCK_K] = A + (m : m+BLOCK_M)[:, None]*A.stride(0) + (k : k+BLOCK_K)[None, :]*A.stride(1); &B[k : k+BLOCK_K, n:n+BLOCK_N] = B + (k : k+BLOCK_K)[:, None]*B.stride(0) + (n : n+BLOCK_N)[None, :]*B.stride(1);
Which means that pointers for blocks of A and B can be initialized (i.e., k=0) in Triton as:
pid_m = triton.program_id(0) pid_n = triton.program_id(1) rm = pid_m * BLOCK_M + triton.arange(0, BLOCK_M) rn = pid_n * BLOCK_N + triton.arange(0, BLOCK_N) rk = triton.arange(0, BLOCK_K) // pointer for A operand pa = A + (rm[:, None] * stride_a_0 + rk[None, :] * stride_a_1); // pointer for B operand pb = B + (rk[:, None] * stride_b_0 + rn[None, :] * stride_b_1);
And then updated in the inner loop as follows:
pa += BLOCK_K * stride_a_1; pb += BLOCK_K * stride_b_0;
L2 Cache Optimizations¶
As mentioned above, each program instance computes an [BLOCK_M, BLOCK_N] block of C.
It is important to remember that the order in which these blocks are computed does matter, since it affects the L2 cache hit rate of our program.
And unfortunately, a simple row-major ordering
pid = triton.program_id(0); grid_m = (M + BLOCK_M - 1) // BLOCK_M; grid_n = (N + BLOCK_N - 1) // BLOCK_N; pid_m = pid / grid_n; pid_n = pid % grid_n;
is just not going to cut it.
One possible solution is to launch blocks in an order that promotes data reuse.
This can be done by ‘super-grouping’ blocks in groups of GROUP_M rows before switching to the next column:
pid = triton.program_id(0); width = GROUP_M * grid_n; group_id = pid // width; # we need to handle the case where M % (GROUP_M*BLOCK_M) != 0 group_size = min(grid_m - group_id * GROUP_M, GROUP_M); pid_m = group_id * GROUP_M + (pid % group_size); pid_n = (pid % width) // (group_size);
In practice, this can improve the performance of our matrix multiplication kernel by >10% on some hardware architecture (e.g., 220 to 245 TFLOPS on A100).
Final Result¶
import torch
import triton
import triton.language as tl
# %
# :code:`triton.jit`'ed functions can be auto-tuned by using the `triton.autotune` decorator, which consumes:
# - A list of :code:`triton.Config` objects that define different configurations of meta-parameters (e.g., BLOCK_M) and compilation options (e.g., num_warps) to try
# - A autotuning *key* whose change in values will trigger evaluation of all the provided configs
@triton.autotune(
configs=[
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 128, 'BLOCK_N': 256, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=3, num_warps=8),
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 256, 'BLOCK_N': 128, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=3, num_warps=8),
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 256, 'BLOCK_N': 64, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=4, num_warps=4),
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 64 , 'BLOCK_N': 256, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=4, num_warps=4),\
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 128, 'BLOCK_N': 128, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=4, num_warps=4),\
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 128, 'BLOCK_N': 64 , 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=4, num_warps=4),\
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 64 , 'BLOCK_N': 128, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=4, num_warps=4),
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 128, 'BLOCK_N': 32 , 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=4, num_warps=4),\
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 64 , 'BLOCK_N': 32 , 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=5, num_warps=2),\
triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 32 , 'BLOCK_N': 64 , 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_stages=5, num_warps=2),
#triton.Config({'BLOCK_M': 64, 'BLOCK_N': 128, 'BLOCK_K': 32, 'GROUP_M': 8}, num_warps=4),
],
key=['M', 'N', 'K'],
)
# %
# We can now define our kernel as normal, using all the techniques presented above
@triton.jit
def _matmul(A, B, C, M, N, K, stride_am, stride_ak, stride_bk, stride_bn, stride_cm, stride_cn, **META):
# extract meta-parameters
BLOCK_M = META['BLOCK_M']
BLOCK_N = META['BLOCK_N']
BLOCK_K = META['BLOCK_K']
GROUP_M = 8
# matrix multiplication
pid = tl.program_id(0)
grid_m = (M + BLOCK_M - 1) // BLOCK_M
grid_n = (N + BLOCK_N - 1) // BLOCK_N
# re-order program ID for better L2 performance
width = GROUP_M * grid_n
group_id = pid // width
group_size = min(grid_m - group_id * GROUP_M, GROUP_M)
pid_m = group_id * GROUP_M + (pid % group_size)
pid_n = (pid % width) // (group_size)
# do matrix multiplication
rm = pid_m * BLOCK_M + tl.arange(0, BLOCK_M)
rn = pid_n * BLOCK_N + tl.arange(0, BLOCK_N)
rk = tl.arange(0, BLOCK_K)
A = A + (rm[:, None] * stride_am + rk[None, :] * stride_ak)
B = B + (rk[:, None] * stride_bk + rn[None, :] * stride_bn)
acc = tl.zeros((BLOCK_M, BLOCK_N), dtype=tl.float32)
for k in range(K, 0, -BLOCK_K):
a = tl.load(A)
b = tl.load(B)
acc += tl.dot(a, b)
A += BLOCK_K * stride_ak
B += BLOCK_K * stride_bk
# triton can accept arbitrary activation function
# via metaparameters!
if META['ACTIVATION']:
acc = META['ACTIVATION'](acc)
# rematerialize rm and rn to save registers
rm = pid_m * BLOCK_M + tl.arange(0, BLOCK_M)
rn = pid_n * BLOCK_N + tl.arange(0, BLOCK_N)
C = C + (rm[:, None] * stride_cm + rn[None, :] * stride_cn)
mask = (rm[:, None] < M) & (rn[None, :] < N)
tl.store(C, acc, mask=mask)
# we can fuse `leaky_relu` by providing it as an `ACTIVATION` meta-parameter in `_matmul`
@triton.jit
def leaky_relu(x):
return tl.where(x >= 0, x, 0.01*x)
We can now create a convenience wrapper function that only takes two input tensors and (1) checks any shape constraint; (2) allocates the output; (3) launches the above kernel
def matmul(a, b, activation=None):
# checks constraints
assert a.shape[1] == b.shape[0], "incompatible dimensions"
assert a.is_contiguous(), "matrix A must be contiguous"
assert b.is_contiguous(), "matrix B must be contiguous"
M, K = a.shape
_, N = b.shape
# allocates output
c = torch.empty((M, N), device=a.device, dtype=a.dtype)
# launch kernel
grid = lambda META: (triton.cdiv(M, META['BLOCK_M']) * triton.cdiv(N, META['BLOCK_N']), )
pgm = _matmul[grid](
a, b, c, M, N, K, \
a.stride(0), a.stride(1), b.stride(0), b.stride(1), c.stride(0), c.stride(1),\
ACTIVATION = activation
)
# done; return the output tensor
return c
Unit Test¶
We can test our custom matrix multiplication operation against a native torch implementation (i.e., cuBLAS)
torch.manual_seed(0)
a = torch.randn((512, 512), device='cuda', dtype=torch.float16)
b = torch.randn((512, 512), device='cuda', dtype=torch.float16)
c_0 = matmul(a, b, activation=None)
c_1 = torch.matmul(a, b)
print(c_0)
print(c_1)
print(triton.testing.allclose(c_0, c_1))
Out:
tensor([[ 1.1045, -36.9688, 31.4688, ..., -11.3984, 24.4531, -32.3438],
[ 6.3555, -19.6094, 34.0938, ..., -5.8945, 5.2891, 6.8867],
[-32.0625, 5.9492, 15.3984, ..., -21.3906, -23.9844, -10.1328],
...,
[ -5.7031, 7.4492, 8.2656, ..., -10.6953, -40.0000, 17.7500],
[ 25.5000, 24.3281, -8.4688, ..., -18.9375, 32.5312, -29.9219],
[ -5.3477, 4.9844, 11.8906, ..., 5.5898, 6.4023, -17.3125]],
device='cuda:0', dtype=torch.float16)
tensor([[ 1.1045, -36.9688, 31.4688, ..., -11.3906, 24.4531, -32.3438],
[ 6.3516, -19.6094, 34.0938, ..., -5.8906, 5.2812, 6.8828],
[-32.0625, 5.9531, 15.3984, ..., -21.4062, -23.9844, -10.1328],
...,
[ -5.7070, 7.4492, 8.2656, ..., -10.6953, -40.0000, 17.7500],
[ 25.5000, 24.3438, -8.4609, ..., -18.9375, 32.5312, -29.9219],
[ -5.3477, 4.9805, 11.8828, ..., 5.5859, 6.4023, -17.3125]],
device='cuda:0', dtype=torch.float16)
tensor(True, device='cuda:0')
Benchmark¶
Square Matrix Performance¶
We can now compare the performance of our kernel against that of cuBLAS. Here we focus on square matrices, but feel free to arrange this script as you wish to benchmark any other matrix shape.
@triton.testing.perf_report(
triton.testing.Benchmark(
x_names=['M', 'N', 'K'], # argument names to use as an x-axis for the plot
x_vals=[128 * i for i in range(1, 33)], # different possible values for `x_name`
line_arg='provider', # argument name whose value corresponds to a different line in the plot
line_vals=['cublas', 'cublas + relu', 'triton', 'triton + relu'], # possible values for `line_arg``
line_names=["cuBLAS", "cuBLAS (+ torch.nn.LeakyReLU)", "Triton", "Triton (+ LeakyReLU)"], # label name for the lines
styles=[('green', '-'), ('green', '--'), ('blue', '-'), ('blue', '--')], # line styles
ylabel="TFLOPS", # label name for the y-axis
plot_name="matmul-performance", # name for the plot. Used also as a file name for saving the plot.
args={}
)
)
def benchmark(M, N, K, provider):
a = torch.randn((M, K), device='cuda', dtype=torch.float16)
b = torch.randn((K, N), device='cuda', dtype=torch.float16)
if provider == 'cublas':
ms, min_ms, max_ms = triton.testing.do_bench(lambda: torch.matmul(a, b))
if provider == 'triton':
ms, min_ms, max_ms = triton.testing.do_bench(lambda: matmul(a, b))
if provider == 'cublas + relu':
torch_relu = torch.nn.ReLU(inplace=True)
ms, min_ms, max_ms = triton.testing.do_bench(lambda: torch_relu(torch.matmul(a, b)))
if provider == 'triton + relu':
ms, min_ms, max_ms = triton.testing.do_bench(lambda: matmul(a, b, activation=leaky_relu))
perf = lambda ms: 2 * M * N * K * 1e-12 / (ms * 1e-3)
return perf(ms), perf(max_ms), perf(min_ms)
benchmark.run(show_plots=True, print_data=True)
Out:
matmul-performance:
M cuBLAS ... Triton Triton (+ LeakyReLU)
0 128.0 0.455111 ... 0.512000 0.512000
1 256.0 2.978909 ... 2.978909 2.978909
2 384.0 7.372800 ... 7.899428 7.899428
3 512.0 14.563555 ... 15.420235 15.420235
4 640.0 22.260869 ... 24.380953 24.380953
5 768.0 32.768000 ... 34.028308 34.028308
6 896.0 39.025776 ... 39.025776 39.025776
7 1024.0 49.932191 ... 52.428801 52.428801
8 1152.0 45.242181 ... 46.656000 46.656000
9 1280.0 51.200001 ... 56.109587 56.109587
10 1408.0 64.138541 ... 65.684049 59.258433
11 1536.0 79.526831 ... 75.296679 75.296679
12 1664.0 63.372618 ... 62.061463 61.636381
13 1792.0 72.983276 ... 68.953520 68.953520
14 1920.0 66.782607 ... 67.434145 68.435645
15 2048.0 73.262953 ... 75.573044 75.234154
16 2176.0 83.155572 ... 80.494588 78.608000
17 2304.0 68.446623 ... 72.607513 72.607513
18 2432.0 71.125224 ... 80.963875 80.963875
19 2560.0 77.649287 ... 75.851852 76.740048
20 2688.0 81.401408 ... 84.483418 85.051697
21 2816.0 80.617762 ... 77.605356 79.733474
22 2944.0 81.967162 ... 80.902653 77.505492
23 3072.0 82.540970 ... 84.010539 84.638425
24 3200.0 84.432717 ... 88.642656 89.260810
25 3328.0 80.617354 ... 83.323259 86.632127
26 3456.0 82.183044 ... 87.252780 84.420490
27 3584.0 85.797134 ... 95.654673 96.269155
28 3712.0 83.317214 ... 88.404730 84.730571
29 3840.0 81.019778 ... 86.197974 85.730230
30 3968.0 92.652949 ... 87.159957 86.911637
31 4096.0 93.271527 ... 91.616198 91.678778
[32 rows x 5 columns]
Total running time of the script: ( 2 minutes 11.538 seconds)