* chore: rename APIs and Microservices to include "Backend" (#42515) * fix typo * fix typo * undo change * Corrected grammar mistake Corrected a grammar mistake by removing a comma. * change APIs and Microservices cert title * update title * Change APIs and Microservices certi title * Update translations.json * update title * feat(curriculum): rename apis and microservices cert * rename folder structure * rename certificate * rename learn Markdown * apis-and-microservices -> back-end-development-and-apis * update backend meta * update i18n langs and cypress test Co-authored-by: Shaun Hamilton <shauhami020@gmail.com> * fix: add development to front-end libraries (#42512) * fix: added-the-word-Development-to-front-end-libraries * fix/added-the-word-Development-to-front-end-libraries * fix/added-word-development-to-front-end-libraries-in-other-related-files * fix/added-the-word-Development-to-front-end-and-all-related-files * fix/removed-typos-from-last-commit-in-index.md * fix/reverted-changes-that-i-made-to-dependecies * fix/removed xvfg * fix/reverted changes that i made to package.json * remove unwanted changes * front-end-development-libraries changes * rename backend certSlug and README * update i18n folder names and keys * test: add legacy path redirect tests This uses serve.json from the client-config repo, since we currently use that in production * fix: create public dir before moving serve.json * fix: add missing script * refactor: collect redirect tests * test: convert to cy.location for stricter tests * rename certificate folder to 00-certificates * change crowdin config to recognise new certificates location * allow translations to be used Co-authored-by: Nicholas Carrigan (he/him) <nhcarrigan@gmail.com> * add forwards slashes to path redirects * fix cypress path tests again * plese cypress * fix: test different challenge Okay so I literally have no idea why this one particular challenge fails in Cypress Firefox ONLY. Tom and I paired and spun a full build instance and confirmed in Firefox the page loads and redirects as expected. Changing to another bootstrap challenge passes Cypress firefox locally. Absolutely boggled by this. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA * fix: separate the test Okay apparently the test does not work unless we separate it into a different `it` statement. >:( >:( >:( >:( Co-authored-by: Sujal Gupta <55016909+heysujal@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Noor Fakhry <65724923+NoorFakhry@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Oliver Eyton-Williams <ojeytonwilliams@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nicholas Carrigan (he/him) <nhcarrigan@gmail.com>
4.6 KiB
id, title, challengeType, forumTopicId, dashedName
id | title | challengeType | forumTopicId | dashedName |
---|---|---|---|---|
5a24c314108439a4d403617a | Pass State as Props to Child Components | 6 | 301403 | pass-state-as-props-to-child-components |
--description--
You saw a lot of examples that passed props to child JSX elements and child React components in previous challenges. You may be wondering where those props come from. A common pattern is to have a stateful component containing the state
important to your app, that then renders child components. You want these components to have access to some pieces of that state
, which are passed in as props.
For example, maybe you have an App
component that renders a Navbar
, among other components. In your App
, you have state
that contains a lot of user information, but the Navbar
only needs access to the user's username so it can display it. You pass that piece of state
to the Navbar
component as a prop.
This pattern illustrates some important paradigms in React. The first is unidirectional data flow. State flows in one direction down the tree of your application's components, from the stateful parent component to child components. The child components only receive the state data they need. The second is that complex stateful apps can be broken down into just a few, or maybe a single, stateful component. The rest of your components simply receive state from the parent as props, and render a UI from that state. It begins to create a separation where state management is handled in one part of code and UI rendering in another. This principle of separating state logic from UI logic is one of React's key principles. When it's used correctly, it makes the design of complex, stateful applications much easier to manage.
--instructions--
The MyApp
component is stateful and renders a Navbar
component as a child. Pass the name
property in its state
down to the child component, then show the name
in the h1
tag that's part of the Navbar
render method. name
should appear after the text Hello, my name is:
.
--hints--
The MyApp
component should render with a Navbar
component inside.
assert(
(function () {
const mockedComponent = Enzyme.mount(React.createElement(MyApp));
return (
mockedComponent.find('MyApp').length === 1 &&
mockedComponent.find('Navbar').length === 1
);
})()
);
The Navbar
component should receive the MyApp
state property name
as props.
async () => {
const waitForIt = (fn) =>
new Promise((resolve, reject) => setTimeout(() => resolve(fn()), 250));
const mockedComponent = Enzyme.mount(React.createElement(MyApp));
const setState = () => {
mockedComponent.setState({ name: 'TestName' });
return waitForIt(() => mockedComponent.find('Navbar').props());
};
const navProps = await setState();
assert(navProps.name === 'TestName');
};
The h1
element in Navbar
should render the name
prop.
async () => {
const waitForIt = (fn) =>
new Promise((resolve, reject) => setTimeout(() => resolve(fn()), 250));
const mockedComponent = Enzyme.mount(React.createElement(MyApp));
const navH1Before = mockedComponent.find('Navbar').find('h1').text();
const setState = () => {
mockedComponent.setState({ name: 'TestName' });
return waitForIt(() => mockedComponent.find('Navbar').find('h1').text());
};
const navH1After = await setState();
assert(new RegExp('TestName').test(navH1After) && navH1After !== navH1Before);
};
--seed--
--after-user-code--
ReactDOM.render(<MyApp />, document.getElementById('root'))
--seed-contents--
class MyApp extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
name: 'CamperBot'
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{/* Change code below this line */}
<Navbar />
{/* Change code above this line */}
</div>
);
}
};
class Navbar extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{/* Change code below this line */}
<h1>Hello, my name is: </h1>
{/* Change code above this line */}
</div>
);
}
};
--solutions--
class MyApp extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
name: 'CamperBot'
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Navbar name={this.state.name}/>
</div>
);
}
};
class Navbar extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<h1>Hello, my name is: {this.props.name}</h1>
</div>
);
}
};