48 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			48 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
---
 | 
						|
title: Big Theta Notation
 | 
						|
---
 | 
						|
## Big Theta Notation
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Big Omega tells us the lower bound of the runtime of a function, and Big O tells us the upper bound. Often times, they are different and we can't put a guarantee on the runtime - it will vary between the two bounds and the inputs. But what happens when they're the same? Then we can give a **theta** (Θ) bound - our function will run in that time, no matter what input we give it. In general, we always want to give a theta bound if possible because it is the most accurate and tightest bound. If we can't give a theta bound, the next best thing is the tightest O bound possible. 
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Take, for example, a function that searches an array for the value 0:
 | 
						|
```python
 | 
						|
def containsZero(arr): #assume normal array of length n with no edge cases
 | 
						|
  for num x in arr:
 | 
						|
    if x == 0:
 | 
						|
       return true
 | 
						|
  return false
 | 
						|
```
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
1. What's the best case? Well, if the array we give it has 0 as the first value, it will take constant time: Ω (1)
 | 
						|
2. What's the worst case? If the array doesn't contain 0, we will have iterated through the whole array: O(n)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
We've given it an omega and O bound, so what about theta? We can't give it one! Depending on the array we give it, the runtime will be somewhere in between constant and linear. 
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Let's change our code a bit.
 | 
						|
```python
 | 
						|
def printNums(arr): #assume normal array of length n with no edge cases
 | 
						|
  for num x in arr:
 | 
						|
    print(x)
 | 
						|
```
 | 
						|
Can you think of a best case and worst case??
 | 
						|
I can't! No matter what array we give it, we have to iterate through every value in the array. So the function will take AT LEAST n time (Ω(n)), but we also know it won't take any longer than n time (O(n)). What does this mean? Our function will take **exactly** n time: Θ(n).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If the bounds are confusing, think about it like this. We have 2 numbers, x and y. We are given that x <= y and that y <= x. If x is less than or equal to y, and y is less than or equal to x, then x has to equal y!
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you're familiar with linked lists, test yourself and think about the runtimes for each of these functions!
 | 
						|
1. get
 | 
						|
2. remove
 | 
						|
3. add 
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Things get even more interesting when you consider a doubly linked list!
 | 
						|
<!-- The article goes here, in GitHub-flavored Markdown. Feel free to add YouTube videos, images, and CodePen/JSBin embeds  -->
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
#### More Information:
 | 
						|
<!-- Please add any articles you think might be helpful to read before writing the article -->
 | 
						|
https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-science/algorithms/asymptotic-notation/a/big-big-theta-notation
 | 
						|
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10376740/what-exactly-does-big-%D3%A8-notation-represent
 | 
						|
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/analysis-of-algorithms-set-3asymptotic-notations/
 | 
						|
 |