Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
0cba307844
commit
015b418114
@ -11,27 +11,33 @@ tags:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Name / classification
|
||||
|
||||
Filterer
|
||||
|
||||
## Intent
|
||||
The intent of this design pattern is to introduce a functional interface that will add a functionality for container-like objects to easily return filtered versions of themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
The intent of this design pattern is to introduce a functional interface that will add a
|
||||
functionality for container-like objects to easily return filtered versions of themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explanation
|
||||
|
||||
Real world example
|
||||
|
||||
> We are designing a threat(malware) detection system. We can have different types of threats and systems. We have a requirement that
|
||||
> system should be aware of threats that are present in it. In the design we have to take into consideration that new Threat types can be
|
||||
> added later. Also there is a requirement that a system can filter itself based on the threats that it possesses (system acts as container-like object for threats).
|
||||
>
|
||||
> We are designing a threat (malware) detection software which can analyze target systems for
|
||||
> threats that are present in it. In the design we have to take into consideration that new
|
||||
> Threat types can be added later. Additionally, there is a requirement that the threat detection
|
||||
> system can filter the detected threats based on different criteria (the target system acts as
|
||||
> container-like object for threats).
|
||||
|
||||
In plain words
|
||||
|
||||
> We need to be able to filter different types of systems(container-like objects) based on properties of Threats that they contain.
|
||||
> Adding new properties for Threats should be easy (we still need the ability to filter by those new properties).
|
||||
> Filterer pattern is a design pattern that helps container-like objects return filtered versions
|
||||
> of themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
**Programmatic Example**
|
||||
|
||||
To model the threat detection example presented above we introduce `Threat` and `ThreatAwareSystem` interfaces.
|
||||
To model the threat detection example presented above we introduce `Threat` and `ThreatAwareSystem`
|
||||
interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
public interface Threat {
|
||||
@ -47,19 +53,26 @@ public interface ThreatAwareSystem {
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
Notice the `filtered` method that returns instance of `Filterer` interface which is defined as :
|
||||
|
||||
Notice the `filtered` method that returns instance of `Filterer` interface which is defined as:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
@FunctionalInterface
|
||||
public interface Filterer<G, E> {
|
||||
G by(Predicate<? super E> predicate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
it is used to fulfill the requirement for system to be able to filter itself based on threat properties.
|
||||
The container-like object (`ThreatAwareSystem` in our case) needs to have a method that returns an instance of `Filterer`. This helper interface gives
|
||||
ability to covariantly specify a lower bound of contravariant `Predicate` in the subinterfaces of interfaces representing the container-like objects.
|
||||
|
||||
In our example we will be able to pass a predicate that takes `? extends Threat` object and return `? extends ThreatAwareSystem`
|
||||
from `Filtered::by` method. A simple implementation of `ThreatAwareSystem` :
|
||||
It is used to fulfill the requirement for system to be able to filter itself based on threat
|
||||
properties. The container-like object (`ThreatAwareSystem` in our case) needs to have a method that
|
||||
returns an instance of `Filterer`. This helper interface gives ability to covariantly specify a
|
||||
lower bound of contravariant `Predicate` in the subinterfaces of interfaces representing the
|
||||
container-like objects.
|
||||
|
||||
In our example we will be able to pass a predicate that takes `? extends Threat` object and
|
||||
return `? extends ThreatAwareSystem` from `Filtered::by` method. A simple implementation
|
||||
of `ThreatAwareSystem`:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
public class SimpleThreatAwareSystem implements ThreatAwareSystem {
|
||||
|
||||
@ -97,15 +110,21 @@ public class SimpleThreatAwareSystem implements ThreatAwareSystem {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
the `filtered` method is overridden to filter the threats list by given predicate.
|
||||
|
||||
Now if we introduce a new subtype of `Threat` interface that adds probability with which given threat can appear :
|
||||
The `filtered` method is overridden to filter the threats list by given predicate.
|
||||
|
||||
Now if we introduce a new subtype of `Threat` interface that adds probability with which given
|
||||
threat can appear:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
public interface ProbableThreat extends Threat {
|
||||
double probability();
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
we can also introduce a new interface that represents a system that is aware of threats with their probabilities :
|
||||
|
||||
We can also introduce a new interface that represents a system that is aware of threats with their
|
||||
probabilities:
|
||||
|
||||
````java
|
||||
public interface ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem extends ThreatAwareSystem {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
@ -115,9 +134,12 @@ public interface ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem extends ThreatAwareSystem {
|
||||
Filterer<? extends ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem, ? extends ProbableThreat> filtered();
|
||||
}
|
||||
````
|
||||
Notice how we override the `filtered` method in `ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem` and specify different return covariant type
|
||||
by specifying different generic types. Our interfaces are clean and not cluttered by default implementations. We
|
||||
we will be able to filter `ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem` by `ProbableThreat` properties :
|
||||
|
||||
Notice how we override the `filtered` method in `ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem` and specify
|
||||
different return covariant type by specifying different generic types. Our interfaces are clean and
|
||||
not cluttered by default implementations. We we will be able to filter
|
||||
`ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem` by `ProbableThreat` properties:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
public class SimpleProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem implements ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem {
|
||||
|
||||
@ -156,7 +178,8 @@ public class SimpleProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem implements ProbabilisticThreat
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Now if we want filter `ThreatAwareSystem` by threat type we can do :
|
||||
Now if we want filter `ThreatAwareSystem` by threat type we can do:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
Threat rootkit = new SimpleThreat(ThreatType.ROOTKIT, 1, "Simple-Rootkit");
|
||||
Threat trojan = new SimpleThreat(ThreatType.TROJAN, 2, "Simple-Trojan");
|
||||
@ -167,7 +190,9 @@ ThreatAwareSystem threatAwareSystem = new SimpleThreatAwareSystem("System-1", th
|
||||
ThreatAwareSystem rootkitThreatAwareSystem = threatAwareSystem.filtered()
|
||||
.by(threat -> threat.type() == ThreatType.ROOTKIT);
|
||||
```
|
||||
or if we want to filter `ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem` :
|
||||
|
||||
Or if we want to filter `ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem`:
|
||||
|
||||
```java
|
||||
ProbableThreat malwareTroyan = new SimpleProbableThreat("Troyan-ArcBomb", 1, ThreatType.TROJAN, 0.99);
|
||||
ProbableThreat rootkit = new SimpleProbableThreat("Rootkit-System", 2, ThreatType.ROOTKIT, 0.8);
|
||||
@ -178,27 +203,37 @@ ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem simpleProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem =new SimpleP
|
||||
ProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem filtered = simpleProbabilisticThreatAwareSystem.filtered()
|
||||
.by(probableThreat -> Double.compare(probableThreat.probability(), 0.99) == 0);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Class diagram
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Applicability
|
||||
Pattern can be used when working with container-like objects that use subtyping, instead of parametrizing(generics) for extensible class structure.
|
||||
It enables you to easily extend filtering ability of container-like objects as business requirements change.
|
||||
|
||||
Pattern can be used when working with container-like objects that use subtyping, instead of
|
||||
parametrizing (generics) for extensible class structure. It enables you to easily extend filtering
|
||||
ability of container-like objects as business requirements change.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tutorials
|
||||
|
||||
* [Article about Filterer pattern posted on it's author's blog](https://blog.tlinkowski.pl/2018/filterer-pattern/)
|
||||
* [Application of Filterer pattern in domain of text analysis](https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2019/02/filterer-pattern-10-steps.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Known uses
|
||||
One of the uses is present on the blog presented in [this](https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2019/02/filterer-pattern-10-steps.html) link.
|
||||
It presents how to use `Filterer` pattern to create text issue analyzer with support for test cases used for unit testing.
|
||||
|
||||
One of the uses is present on the blog presented in
|
||||
[this](https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2019/02/filterer-pattern-10-steps.html) link. It presents how
|
||||
to use `Filterer` pattern to create text issue analyzer with support for test cases used for unit
|
||||
testing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
Pros :
|
||||
* you can easily introduce new subtypes for container-like objects and subtypes for objects that are contained within them and still be able to filter easily be new properties of those new subtypes.
|
||||
|
||||
Cons :
|
||||
* covariant return types mixed with generics can be sometimes tricky
|
||||
Pros:
|
||||
* You can easily introduce new subtypes for container-like objects and subtypes for objects that are contained within them and still be able to filter easily be new properties of those new subtypes.
|
||||
|
||||
Cons:
|
||||
* Covariant return types mixed with generics can be sometimes tricky
|
||||
|
||||
## Credits
|
||||
* Author of the pattern : [Tomasz Linkowski](https://tlinkowski.pl/)
|
||||
|
||||
* Author of the pattern : [Tomasz Linkowski](https://tlinkowski.pl/)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user