|
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
|
use {
|
|
|
|
|
crate::{block_cost_limits::*, cost_model::TransactionCost},
|
|
|
|
|
solana_sdk::{clock::Slot, pubkey::Pubkey},
|
|
|
|
|
solana_sdk::{clock::Slot, pubkey::Pubkey, transaction::Transaction},
|
|
|
|
|
std::collections::HashMap,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -16,9 +16,6 @@ pub enum CostTrackerError {
|
|
|
|
|
/// would exceed block max limit
|
|
|
|
|
WouldExceedBlockMaxLimit,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// would exceed vote max limit
|
|
|
|
|
WouldExceedVoteMaxLimit,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// would exceed account max limit
|
|
|
|
|
WouldExceedAccountMaxLimit,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@ -27,66 +24,55 @@ pub enum CostTrackerError {
|
|
|
|
|
pub struct CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
account_cost_limit: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
block_cost_limit: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
vote_cost_limit: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
cost_by_writable_accounts: HashMap<Pubkey, u64>,
|
|
|
|
|
block_cost: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
vote_cost: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
transaction_count: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl Default for CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
fn default() -> Self {
|
|
|
|
|
CostTracker::new(MAX_WRITABLE_ACCOUNT_UNITS, MAX_BLOCK_UNITS, MAX_VOTE_UNITS)
|
|
|
|
|
CostTracker::new(MAX_WRITABLE_ACCOUNT_UNITS, MAX_BLOCK_UNITS)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn new(account_cost_limit: u64, block_cost_limit: u64, vote_cost_limit: u64) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn new(account_cost_limit: u64, block_cost_limit: u64) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(account_cost_limit <= block_cost_limit);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(vote_cost_limit <= block_cost_limit);
|
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
|
account_cost_limit,
|
|
|
|
|
block_cost_limit,
|
|
|
|
|
vote_cost_limit,
|
|
|
|
|
cost_by_writable_accounts: HashMap::with_capacity(WRITABLE_ACCOUNTS_PER_BLOCK),
|
|
|
|
|
block_cost: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
vote_cost: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
transaction_count: 0,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// bench tests needs to reset limits
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn set_limits(
|
|
|
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
|
|
|
account_cost_limit: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
block_cost_limit: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
vote_cost_limit: u64,
|
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn set_limits(&mut self, account_cost_limit: u64, block_cost_limit: u64) {
|
|
|
|
|
self.account_cost_limit = account_cost_limit;
|
|
|
|
|
self.block_cost_limit = block_cost_limit;
|
|
|
|
|
self.vote_cost_limit = vote_cost_limit;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn would_transaction_fit(
|
|
|
|
|
&self,
|
|
|
|
|
is_vote: bool,
|
|
|
|
|
_transaction: &Transaction,
|
|
|
|
|
tx_cost: &TransactionCost,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<(), CostTrackerError> {
|
|
|
|
|
self.would_fit(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, tx_cost.sum(), is_vote)
|
|
|
|
|
self.would_fit(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, &tx_cost.sum())
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn add_transaction_cost(&mut self, is_vote: bool, tx_cost: &TransactionCost) {
|
|
|
|
|
self.add_transaction(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, tx_cost.sum(), is_vote);
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn add_transaction_cost(&mut self, _transaction: &Transaction, tx_cost: &TransactionCost) {
|
|
|
|
|
self.add_transaction(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, &tx_cost.sum());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn try_add(
|
|
|
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
|
|
|
is_vote: bool,
|
|
|
|
|
_transaction: &Transaction,
|
|
|
|
|
tx_cost: &TransactionCost,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<u64, CostTrackerError> {
|
|
|
|
|
let cost = tx_cost.sum();
|
|
|
|
|
self.would_fit(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, cost, is_vote)?;
|
|
|
|
|
self.add_transaction(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, cost, is_vote);
|
|
|
|
|
self.would_fit(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, &cost)?;
|
|
|
|
|
self.add_transaction(&tx_cost.writable_accounts, &cost);
|
|
|
|
|
Ok(self.block_cost)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -102,7 +88,6 @@ impl CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
"cost_tracker_stats",
|
|
|
|
|
("bank_slot", bank_slot as i64, i64),
|
|
|
|
|
("block_cost", self.block_cost as i64, i64),
|
|
|
|
|
("vote_cost", self.vote_cost as i64, i64),
|
|
|
|
|
("transaction_count", self.transaction_count as i64, i64),
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
|
"number_of_accounts",
|
|
|
|
@ -127,19 +112,14 @@ impl CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
(costliest_account, costliest_account_cost)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn would_fit(&self, keys: &[Pubkey], cost: u64, is_vote: bool) -> Result<(), CostTrackerError> {
|
|
|
|
|
fn would_fit(&self, keys: &[Pubkey], cost: &u64) -> Result<(), CostTrackerError> {
|
|
|
|
|
// check against the total package cost
|
|
|
|
|
if self.block_cost.saturating_add(cost) > self.block_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
if self.block_cost + cost > self.block_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
return Err(CostTrackerError::WouldExceedBlockMaxLimit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// if vote transaction, check if it exceeds vote_transaction_limit
|
|
|
|
|
if is_vote && self.vote_cost.saturating_add(cost) > self.vote_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
return Err(CostTrackerError::WouldExceedVoteMaxLimit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check if the transaction itself is more costly than the account_cost_limit
|
|
|
|
|
if cost > self.account_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
if *cost > self.account_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
return Err(CostTrackerError::WouldExceedAccountMaxLimit);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -147,7 +127,7 @@ impl CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
for account_key in keys.iter() {
|
|
|
|
|
match self.cost_by_writable_accounts.get(&account_key) {
|
|
|
|
|
Some(chained_cost) => {
|
|
|
|
|
if chained_cost.saturating_add(cost) > self.account_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
if chained_cost + cost > self.account_cost_limit {
|
|
|
|
|
return Err(CostTrackerError::WouldExceedAccountMaxLimit);
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
@ -160,19 +140,15 @@ impl CostTracker {
|
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn add_transaction(&mut self, keys: &[Pubkey], cost: u64, is_vote: bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
fn add_transaction(&mut self, keys: &[Pubkey], cost: &u64) {
|
|
|
|
|
for account_key in keys.iter() {
|
|
|
|
|
let account_cost = self
|
|
|
|
|
*self
|
|
|
|
|
.cost_by_writable_accounts
|
|
|
|
|
.entry(*account_key)
|
|
|
|
|
.or_insert(0);
|
|
|
|
|
*account_cost = account_cost.saturating_add(cost);
|
|
|
|
|
.or_insert(0) += cost;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
self.block_cost = self.block_cost.saturating_add(cost);
|
|
|
|
|
if is_vote {
|
|
|
|
|
self.vote_cost = self.vote_cost.saturating_add(cost);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
self.transaction_count = self.transaction_count.saturating_add(1);
|
|
|
|
|
self.block_cost += cost;
|
|
|
|
|
self.transaction_count += 1;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -218,10 +194,9 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
|
fn test_cost_tracker_initialization() {
|
|
|
|
|
let testee = CostTracker::new(10, 11, 8);
|
|
|
|
|
let testee = CostTracker::new(10, 11);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(10, testee.account_cost_limit);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(11, testee.block_cost_limit);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(8, testee.vote_cost_limit);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(0, testee.cost_by_writable_accounts.len());
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(0, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@ -232,28 +207,10 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx, keys, cost) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for one simple transaction
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cost, cost, cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys, cost, false).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys, cost, false);
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cost, cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys, &cost).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys, &cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(0, testee.vote_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
let (_costliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost, costliest_account_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
|
fn test_cost_tracker_ok_add_one_vote() {
|
|
|
|
|
let (mint_keypair, start_hash) = test_setup();
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx, keys, cost) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for one simple transaction
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cost, cost, cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys, cost, true).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys, cost, true);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost, testee.vote_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
let (_ccostliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost, costliest_account_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
@ -264,19 +221,17 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx2, keys2, cost2) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for two simple transactions, with same accounts
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cost1 + cost2, cost1 + cost2, cost1 + cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cost1 + cost2, cost1 + cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, cost1, false).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, cost1, false);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, &cost1).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, &cost1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, cost2, false).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys2, cost2, false);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, &cost2).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys2, &cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost1 + cost2, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(1, testee.cost_by_writable_accounts.len());
|
|
|
|
|
let (_ccostliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost1 + cost2, costliest_account_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
@ -288,19 +243,17 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx2, keys2, cost2) = build_simple_transaction(&second_account, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for two simple transactions, with same accounts
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cmp::max(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2, cost1 + cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cmp::max(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, cost1, false).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, cost1, false);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, &cost1).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, &cost1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, cost2, false).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys2, cost2, false);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, &cost2).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys2, &cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost1 + cost2, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(2, testee.cost_by_writable_accounts.len());
|
|
|
|
|
let (_ccostliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(std::cmp::max(cost1, cost2), costliest_account_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
@ -311,21 +264,20 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx2, keys2, cost2) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for two simple transactions, but not for same accounts
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cmp::min(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2, cost1 + cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cmp::min(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2);
|
|
|
|
|
// should have room for first transaction
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, cost1, false).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, cost1, false);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, &cost1).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, &cost1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// but no more sapce on the same chain (same signer account)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, cost2, false).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, &cost2).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
|
fn test_cost_tracker_reach_limit() {
|
|
|
|
|
let none_vote = false;
|
|
|
|
|
let (mint_keypair, start_hash) = test_setup();
|
|
|
|
|
// build two transactions with diff accounts
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx1, keys1, cost1) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
@ -333,50 +285,22 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx2, keys2, cost2) = build_simple_transaction(&second_account, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for each chain, but not enough room for both transactions
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee =
|
|
|
|
|
CostTracker::new(cmp::max(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2 - 1, cost1 + cost2 - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cmp::max(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2 - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
// should have room for first transaction
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, cost1, none_vote).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, cost1, none_vote);
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, &cost1).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, &cost1);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// but no more room for package as whole
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, cost2, none_vote).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
|
fn test_cost_tracker_reach_vote_limit() {
|
|
|
|
|
let is_vote = true;
|
|
|
|
|
let (mint_keypair, start_hash) = test_setup();
|
|
|
|
|
// build two mocking vote transactions with diff accounts
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx1, keys1, cost1) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
let second_account = Keypair::new();
|
|
|
|
|
let (_tx2, keys2, cost2) = build_simple_transaction(&second_account, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// build testee to have capacity for each chain, but not enough room for both votes
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(cmp::max(cost1, cost2), cost1 + cost2, cost1 + cost2 - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
// should have room for first vote
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys1, cost1, is_vote).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
testee.add_transaction(&keys1, cost1, is_vote);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// but no more room for package as whole
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, cost2, is_vote).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
// however there is room for tx2, if it is not a vote
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, cost2, !is_vote).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.would_fit(&keys2, &cost2).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
|
fn test_cost_tracker_try_add_is_atomic() {
|
|
|
|
|
let (mint_keypair, start_hash) = test_setup();
|
|
|
|
|
let (_ctx, _keys, _cost) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
let none_vote = false;
|
|
|
|
|
let (tx, _keys, _cost) = build_simple_transaction(&mint_keypair, &start_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let acct1 = Pubkey::new_unique();
|
|
|
|
|
let acct2 = Pubkey::new_unique();
|
|
|
|
@ -385,7 +309,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
let account_max = cost * 2;
|
|
|
|
|
let block_max = account_max * 3; // for three accts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(account_max, block_max, block_max);
|
|
|
|
|
let mut testee = CostTracker::new(account_max, block_max);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// case 1: a tx writes to 3 accounts, should success, we will have:
|
|
|
|
|
// | acct1 | $cost |
|
|
|
|
@ -398,7 +322,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
execution_cost: cost,
|
|
|
|
|
..TransactionCost::default()
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.try_add(none_vote, &tx_cost).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.try_add(&tx, &tx_cost).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
let (_costliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(3, testee.cost_by_writable_accounts.len());
|
|
|
|
@ -416,7 +340,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
execution_cost: cost,
|
|
|
|
|
..TransactionCost::default()
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.try_add(none_vote, &tx_cost).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.try_add(&tx, &tx_cost).is_ok());
|
|
|
|
|
let (costliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost * 2, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(3, testee.cost_by_writable_accounts.len());
|
|
|
|
@ -436,7 +360,7 @@ mod tests {
|
|
|
|
|
execution_cost: cost,
|
|
|
|
|
..TransactionCost::default()
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.try_add(none_vote, &tx_cost).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(testee.try_add(&tx, &tx_cost).is_err());
|
|
|
|
|
let (costliest_account, costliest_account_cost) = testee.find_costliest_account();
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(cost * 2, testee.block_cost);
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(3, testee.cost_by_writable_accounts.len());
|
|
|
|
|