mergify[bot] a07e90516b separates out ClusterInfo::{gossip,listen} thread-pools (#12535) (#12547)
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/12402
moved gossip-work threads:
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/afd9bfc45/core/src/cluster_info.rs#L2330-L2334
to ClusterInfo::new as a new field in the ClusterInfo struct:
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/35208c5ee/core/src/cluster_info.rs#L249
So that they can be shared between listen and gossip threads:
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/afd9bfc45/core/src/gossip_service.rs#L54-L67

However, in testing https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/12360
it turned out this will cause breakage:
https://buildkite.com/solana-labs/solana/builds/31646
https://buildkite.com/solana-labs/solana/builds/31651
https://buildkite.com/solana-labs/solana/builds/31655
Whereas with separate thread pools all is good. It might be the case
that one thread is slowing down the other by exhausting the thread-pool
whereas with separate thread-pools we get fair scheduling guarantees
from the os.

This commit reverts https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/12402
and instead adds separate thread-pools for listen and gossip threads:
https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/blob/afd9bfc45/core/src/gossip_service.rs#L54-L67

(cherry picked from commit 0d5258b6d3)

Co-authored-by: behzad nouri <behzadnouri@gmail.com>
2020-09-29 11:27:47 +00:00
2020-07-14 11:49:25 -07:00
2020-09-24 16:58:18 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-28 09:34:35 -07:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-28 09:34:35 -07:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2020-09-24 07:42:54 +00:00
2018-07-12 09:40:40 -06:00
2018-12-20 12:32:25 -08:00
2020-08-04 10:51:25 -07:00
2020-08-04 16:34:45 -07:00
2020-08-29 09:23:20 -07:00
2020-04-18 15:11:55 -07:00

Solana

Solana crate Solana documentation Build status codecov

Building

1. Install rustc, cargo and rustfmt.

$ curl https://sh.rustup.rs -sSf | sh
$ source $HOME/.cargo/env
$ rustup component add rustfmt

If your rustc version is lower than 1.39.0, please update it:

$ rustup update

On Linux systems you may need to install libssl-dev, pkg-config, zlib1g-dev, etc. On Ubuntu:

$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install libssl-dev libudev-dev pkg-config zlib1g-dev llvm clang

2. Download the source code.

$ git clone https://github.com/solana-labs/solana.git
$ cd solana

3. Build.

$ cargo build

4. Run a minimal local cluster.

$ ./run.sh

Testing

Run the test suite:

$ cargo test

Starting a local testnet

Start your own testnet locally, instructions are in the online docs.

Accessing the remote testnet

  • testnet - public stable testnet accessible via devnet.solana.com. Runs 24/7

Benchmarking

First install the nightly build of rustc. cargo bench requires use of the unstable features only available in the nightly build.

$ rustup install nightly

Run the benchmarks:

$ cargo +nightly bench

Release Process

The release process for this project is described here.

Code coverage

To generate code coverage statistics:

$ scripts/coverage.sh
$ open target/cov/lcov-local/index.html

Why coverage? While most see coverage as a code quality metric, we see it primarily as a developer productivity metric. When a developer makes a change to the codebase, presumably it's a solution to some problem. Our unit-test suite is how we encode the set of problems the codebase solves. Running the test suite should indicate that your change didn't infringe on anyone else's solutions. Adding a test protects your solution from future changes. Say you don't understand why a line of code exists, try deleting it and running the unit-tests. The nearest test failure should tell you what problem was solved by that code. If no test fails, go ahead and submit a Pull Request that asks, "what problem is solved by this code?" On the other hand, if a test does fail and you can think of a better way to solve the same problem, a Pull Request with your solution would most certainly be welcome! Likewise, if rewriting a test can better communicate what code it's protecting, please send us that patch!

Disclaimer

All claims, content, designs, algorithms, estimates, roadmaps, specifications, and performance measurements described in this project are done with the author's best effort. It is up to the reader to check and validate their accuracy and truthfulness. Furthermore nothing in this project constitutes a solicitation for investment.

Description
Web-Scale Blockchain for fast, secure, scalable, decentralized apps and marketplaces.
Readme 514 MiB
Languages
Rust 87.7%
TypeScript 8%
Shell 2.6%
SCSS 0.7%
C 0.6%
Other 0.2%