fix(curriculum): clean-up Project Euler 121-140 (#42731)

* fix: clean-up Project Euler 121-140

* fix: corrections from review

Co-authored-by: Sem Bauke <46919888+Sembauke@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: missing backticks

Co-authored-by: Kristofer Koishigawa <scissorsneedfoodtoo@gmail.com>

* fix: corrections from review

Co-authored-by: Tom <20648924+moT01@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: missing delimiter

Co-authored-by: Sem Bauke <46919888+Sembauke@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kristofer Koishigawa <scissorsneedfoodtoo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom <20648924+moT01@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
gikf
2021-07-16 21:38:37 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent dc3b2508e4
commit 7907f62337
20 changed files with 314 additions and 185 deletions

View File

@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ Find the maximum prize fund that should be allocated to a single game in which f
# --hints--
`euler121()` should return 2269.
`discGamePrize()` should return `2269`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler121(), 2269);
assert.strictEqual(discGamePrize(), 2269);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler121(), 2269);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler121() {
function discGamePrize() {
return true;
}
euler121();
discGamePrize();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,28 +8,41 @@ dashedName: problem-122-efficient-exponentiation
# --description--
The most naive way of computing n15 requires fourteen multiplications:
The most naive way of computing $n^{15}$ requires fourteen multiplications:
n × n × ... × n = n15
$$n × n × \ldots × n = n^{15}$$
But using a "binary" method you can compute it in six multiplications:
n × n = n2n2 × n2 = n4n4 × n4 = n8n8 × n4 = n12n12 × n2 = n14n14 × n = n15
$$\begin{align}
& n × n = n^2\\\\
& n^2 × n^2 = n^4\\\\
& n^4 × n^4 = n^8\\\\
& n^8 × n^4 = n^{12}\\\\
& n^{12} × n^2 = n^{14}\\\\
& n^{14} × n = n^{15}
\end{align}$$
However it is yet possible to compute it in only five multiplications:
n × n = n2n2 × n = n3n3 × n3 = n6n6 × n6 = n12n12 × n3 = n15
$$\begin{align}
& n × n = n^2\\\\
& n^2 × n = n^3\\\\
& n^3 × n^3 = n^6\\\\
& n^6 × n^6 = n^{12}\\\\
& n^{12} × n^3 = n^{15}
\end{align}$$
We shall define m(k) to be the minimum number of multiplications to compute nk; for example m(15) = 5.
We shall define $m(k)$ to be the minimum number of multiplications to compute $n^k$; for example $m(15) = 5$.
For 1 ≤ k ≤ 200, find m(k).
For $1 ≤ k ≤ 200$, find $\sum{m(k)}$.
# --hints--
`euler122()` should return 1582.
`efficientExponentation()` should return `1582`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler122(), 1582);
assert.strictEqual(efficientExponentation(), 1582);
```
# --seed--
@ -37,12 +50,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler122(), 1582);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler122() {
function efficientExponentation() {
return true;
}
euler122();
efficientExponentation();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ dashedName: problem-123-prime-square-remainders
# --description--
Let pn be the nth prime: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, ..., and let r be the remainder when (pn1)n + (pn+1)n is divided by pn2.
Let $p_n$ be the $n$th prime: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, ..., and let $r$ be the remainder when ${(p_n1)}^n + {(p_n+1)}^n$ is divided by ${p_n}^2$.
For example, when n = 3, p3 = 5, and 43 + 63 = 280 ≡ 5 mod 25.
For example, when $n = 3, p_3 = 5$, and $4^3 + 6^3 = 280 ≡ 5\\ mod\\ 25$.
The least value of n for which the remainder first exceeds 109 is 7037.
The least value of $n$ for which the remainder first exceeds $10^9$ is 7037.
Find the least value of n for which the remainder first exceeds 1010.
Find the least value of $n$ for which the remainder first exceeds $10^{10}$.
# --hints--
`euler123()` should return 21035.
`primeSquareRemainders()` should return `21035`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler123(), 21035);
assert.strictEqual(primeSquareRemainders(), 21035);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler123(), 21035);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler123() {
function primeSquareRemainders() {
return true;
}
euler123();
primeSquareRemainders();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,42 +8,118 @@ dashedName: problem-124-ordered-radicals
# --description--
The radical of n, rad(n), is the product of the distinct prime factors of n. For example, 504 = 23 × 32 × 7, so rad(504) = 2 × 3 × 7 = 42.
The radical of $n, rad(n)$, is the product of the distinct prime factors of $n$. For example, $504 = 2^3 × 3^2 × 7$, so $rad(504) = 2 × 3 × 7 = 42$.
If we calculate rad(n) for 1 ≤ n ≤ 10, then sort them on rad(n), and sorting on n if the radical values are equal, we get:
If we calculate $rad(n)$ for $1 ≤ n ≤ 10$, then sort them on $rad(n)$, and sorting on $n$ if the radical values are equal, we get:
Unsorted
<div style="text-align: center;">
<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">$Unsorted$</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">$Sorted$</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>$n$</td>
<td>$rad(n)$</td>
<td></td>
<td>$n$</td>
<td>$rad(n)$</td>
<td>$k$</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td></td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td></td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
<td></td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>2</td>
<td></td>
<td>8</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>5</td>
<td></td>
<td>3</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>6</td>
<td></td>
<td>9</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>7</td>
<td></td>
<td>5</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>2</td>
<td></td>
<td>6</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>3</td>
<td></td>
<td>7</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>10</td>
<td></td>
<td>10</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><br>
Sorted n rad(n)
n rad(n) k 11
111 22
222 33
423 42
824 55
335 66
936 77
557 82
668 93
779 1010
101010 Let E(k) be the kth element in the sorted n column; for example, E(4) = 8 and E(6) = 9. If rad(n) is sorted for 1 ≤ n ≤ 100000, find E(10000).
Let $E(k)$ be the $k$th element in the sorted $n$ column; for example, $E(4) = 8$ and $E(6) = 9$. If $rad(n)$ is sorted for $1 ≤ n ≤ 100000$, find $E(10000)$.
# --hints--
`euler124()` should return 21417.
`orderedRadicals()` should return `21417`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler124(), 21417);
assert.strictEqual(orderedRadicals(), 21417);
```
# --seed--
@ -51,12 +127,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler124(), 21417);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler124() {
function orderedRadicals() {
return true;
}
euler124();
orderedRadicals();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,18 +8,18 @@ dashedName: problem-125-palindromic-sums
# --description--
The palindromic number 595 is interesting because it can be written as the sum of consecutive squares: 62 + 72 + 82 + 92 + 102 + 112 + 122.
The palindromic number 595 is interesting because it can be written as the sum of consecutive squares: $6^2 + 7^2 + 8^2 + 9^2 + 10^2 + 11^2 + 12^2$.
There are exactly eleven palindromes below one-thousand that can be written as consecutive square sums, and the sum of these palindromes is 4164. Note that 1 = 02 + 12 has not been included as this problem is concerned with the squares of positive integers.
There are exactly eleven palindromes below one-thousand that can be written as consecutive square sums, and the sum of these palindromes is 4164. Note that $1 = 0^2 + 1^2$ has not been included as this problem is concerned with the squares of positive integers.
Find the sum of all the numbers less than 108 that are both palindromic and can be written as the sum of consecutive squares.
Find the sum of all the numbers less than $10^8$ that are both palindromic and can be written as the sum of consecutive squares.
# --hints--
`euler125()` should return 2906969179.
`palindromicSums()` should return `2906969179`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler125(), 2906969179);
assert.strictEqual(palindromicSums(), 2906969179);
```
# --seed--
@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler125(), 2906969179);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler125() {
function palindromicSums() {
return true;
}
euler125();
palindromicSums();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -10,14 +10,24 @@ dashedName: problem-126-cuboid-layers
The minimum number of cubes to cover every visible face on a cuboid measuring 3 x 2 x 1 is twenty-two.
If we then add a second layer to this solid it would require forty-six cubes to cover every visible face, the third layer would require seventy-eight cubes, and the fourth layer would require one-hundred and eighteen cubes to cover every visible face. However, the first layer on a cuboid measuring 5 x 1 x 1 also requires twenty-two cubes; similarly the first layer on cuboids measuring 5 x 3 x 1, 7 x 2 x 1, and 11 x 1 x 1 all contain forty-six cubes. We shall define C(n) to represent the number of cuboids that contain n cubes in one of its layers. So C(22) = 2, C(46) = 4, C(78) = 5, and C(118) = 8. It turns out that 154 is the least value of n for which C(n) = 10. Find the least value of n for which C(n) = 1000.
<img class="img-responsive center-block" alt="3x2x1 cuboid covered by twenty-two 1x1x1 cubes" src="https://cdn.freecodecamp.org/curriculum/project-euler/cuboid-layers.png" style="background-color: white; padding: 10px;">
If we add a second layer to this solid it would require forty-six cubes to cover every visible face, the third layer would require seventy-eight cubes, and the fourth layer would require one-hundred and eighteen cubes to cover every visible face.
However, the first layer on a cuboid measuring 5 x 1 x 1 also requires twenty-two cubes; similarly, the first layer on cuboids measuring 5 x 3 x 1, 7 x 2 x 1, and 11 x 1 x 1 all contain forty-six cubes.
We shall define $C(n)$ to represent the number of cuboids that contain $n$ cubes in one of its layers. So $C(22) = 2$, $C(46) = 4$, $C(78) = 5$, and $C(118) = 8$.
It turns out that 154 is the least value of $n$ for which $C(n) = 10$.
Find the least value of $n$ for which $C(n) = 1000$.
# --hints--
`euler126()` should return 18522.
`cuboidLayers()` should return `18522`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler126(), 18522);
assert.strictEqual(cuboidLayers(), 18522);
```
# --seed--
@ -25,12 +35,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler126(), 18522);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler126() {
function cuboidLayers() {
return true;
}
euler126();
cuboidLayers();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,38 +8,32 @@ dashedName: problem-127-abc-hits
# --description--
The radical of n, rad(n), is the product of distinct prime factors of n. For example, 504 = 23 × 32 × 7, so rad(504) = 2 × 3 × 7 = 42.
The radical of $n$, $rad(n)$, is the product of distinct prime factors of $n$. For example, $504 = 2^3 × 3^2 × 7$, so $rad(504) = 2 × 3 × 7 = 42$.
We shall define the triplet of positive integers (a, b, c) to be an abc-hit if:
GCD(a, b) = GCD(a, c) = GCD(b, c) = 1
a &lt; b
a + b = c
rad(abc) &lt; c
1. $GCD(a, b) = GCD(a, c) = GCD(b, c) = 1$
2. $a &lt; b$
3. $a + b = c$
4. $rad(abc) &lt; c$
For example, (5, 27, 32) is an abc-hit, because:
GCD(5, 27) = GCD(5, 32) = GCD(27, 32) = 1
1. $GCD(5, 27) = GCD(5, 32) = GCD(27, 32) = 1$
2. $5 &lt; 27$
3. $5 + 27 = 32$
4. $rad(4320) = 30 &lt; 32$
5 &lt; 27
It turns out that abc-hits are quite rare and there are only thirty-one abc-hits for $c &lt; 1000$, with $\sum{c} = 12523$.
5 + 27 = 32
rad(4320) = 30 &lt; 32
It turns out that abc-hits are quite rare and there are only thirty-one abc-hits for c &lt; 1000, with ∑c = 12523.
Find ∑c for c &lt; 120000.
Find $\sum{c}$ for $c &lt; 120000$.
# --hints--
`euler127()` should return 18407904.
`abcHits()` should return `18407904`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler127(), 18407904);
assert.strictEqual(abcHits(), 18407904);
```
# --seed--
@ -47,12 +41,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler127(), 18407904);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler127() {
function abcHits() {
return true;
}
euler127();
abcHits();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -12,14 +12,26 @@ A hexagonal tile with number 1 is surrounded by a ring of six hexagonal tiles, s
New rings are added in the same fashion, with the next rings being numbered 8 to 19, 20 to 37, 38 to 61, and so on. The diagram below shows the first three rings.
By finding the difference between tile n and each of its six neighbours we shall define PD(n) to be the number of those differences which are prime. For example, working clockwise around tile 8 the differences are 12, 29, 11, 6, 1, and 13. So PD(8) = 3. In the same way, the differences around tile 17 are 1, 17, 16, 1, 11, and 10, hence PD(17) = 2. It can be shown that the maximum value of PD(n) is 3. If all of the tiles for which PD(n) = 3 are listed in ascending order to form a sequence, the 10th tile would be 271. Find the 2000th tile in this sequence.
<img class="img-responsive center-block" alt="three first rings of arranged hexagonal tiles with numbers 1 to 37, and with highlighted tiles 8 and 17" src="https://cdn.freecodecamp.org/curriculum/project-euler/hexagonal-tile-differences.png" style="background-color: white; padding: 10px;">
By finding the difference between tile $n$ and each of its six neighbours we shall define $PD(n)$ to be the number of those differences which are prime.
For example, working clockwise around tile 8 the differences are 12, 29, 11, 6, 1, and 13. So $PD(8) = 3$.
In the same way, the differences around tile 17 are 1, 17, 16, 1, 11, and 10, hence $PD(17) = 2$.
It can be shown that the maximum value of $PD(n)$ is $3$.
If all of the tiles for which $PD(n) = 3$ are listed in ascending order to form a sequence, the 10th tile would be 271.
Find the 2000th tile in this sequence.
# --hints--
`euler128()` should return 14516824220.
`hexagonalTile()` should return `14516824220`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler128(), 14516824220);
assert.strictEqual(hexagonalTile(), 14516824220);
```
# --seed--
@ -27,12 +39,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler128(), 14516824220);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler128() {
function hexagonalTile() {
return true;
}
euler128();
hexagonalTile();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ dashedName: problem-129-repunit-divisibility
# --description--
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define R(k) to be a repunit of length k; for example, R(6) = 111111.
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define $R(k)$ to be a repunit of length $k$; for example, $R(6) = 111111$.
Given that n is a positive integer and GCD(n, 10) = 1, it can be shown that there always exists a value, k, for which R(k) is divisible by n, and let A(n) be the least such value of k; for example, A(7) = 6 and A(41) = 5.
Given that $n$ is a positive integer and $GCD(n, 10) = 1$, it can be shown that there always exists a value, $k$, for which $R(k)$ is divisible by $n$, and let $A(n)$ be the least such value of $k$; for example, $A(7) = 6$ and $A(41) = 5$.
The least value of n for which A(n) first exceeds ten is 17.
The least value of $n$ for which $A(n)$ first exceeds ten is 17.
Find the least value of n for which A(n) first exceeds one-million.
Find the least value of $n$ for which $A(n)$ first exceeds one-million.
# --hints--
`euler129()` should return 1000023.
`repunitDivisibility()` should return `1000023`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler129(), 1000023);
assert.strictEqual(repunitDivisibility(), 1000023);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler129(), 1000023);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler129() {
function repunitDivisibility() {
return true;
}
euler129();
repunitDivisibility();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,22 +8,22 @@ dashedName: problem-130-composites-with-prime-repunit-property
# --description--
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define R(k) to be a repunit of length k; for example, R(6) = 111111.
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define $R(k)$ to be a repunit of length $k$; for example, $R(6) = 111111$.
Given that n is a positive integer and GCD(n, 10) = 1, it can be shown that there always exists a value, k, for which R(k) is divisible by n, and let A(n) be the least such value of k; for example, A(7) = 6 and A(41) = 5.
Given that $n$ is a positive integer and $GCD(n, 10) = 1$, it can be shown that there always exists a value, $k$, for which $R(k)$ is divisible by $n$, and let $A(n)$ be the least such value of $k$; for example, $A(7) = 6$ and $A(41) = 5$.
You are given that for all primes, p > 5, that p 1 is divisible by A(p). For example, when p = 41, A(41) = 5, and 40 is divisible by 5.
You are given that for all primes, $p > 5$, that $p 1$ is divisible by $A(p)$. For example, when $p = 41, A(41) = 5$, and 40 is divisible by 5.
However, there are rare composite values for which this is also true; the first five examples being 91, 259, 451, 481, and 703.
Find the sum of the first twenty-five composite values of n for whichGCD(n, 10) = 1 and n 1 is divisible by A(n).
Find the sum of the first twenty-five composite values of $n$ for which $GCD(n, 10) = 1$ and $n 1$ is divisible by $A(n)$.
# --hints--
`euler130()` should return 149253.
`compositeRepunit()` should return `149253`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler130(), 149253);
assert.strictEqual(compositeRepunit(), 149253);
```
# --seed--
@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler130(), 149253);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler130() {
function compositeRepunit() {
return true;
}
euler130();
compositeRepunit();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ dashedName: problem-131-prime-cube-partnership
# --description--
There are some prime values, p, for which there exists a positive integer, n, such that the expression n3 + n2p is a perfect cube.
There are some prime values, $p$, for which there exists a positive integer, $n$, such that the expression $n^3 + n^{2}p$ is a perfect cube.
For example, when p = 19, 83 + 82×19 = 123.
For example, when $p = 19,\\ 8^3 + 8^2 × 19 = {12}^3$.
What is perhaps most surprising is that for each prime with this property the value of n is unique, and there are only four such primes below one-hundred.
What is perhaps most surprising is that the value of $n$ is unique for each prime with this property, and there are only four such primes below one hundred.
How many primes below one million have this remarkable property?
# --hints--
`euler131()` should return 173.
`primeCubePartnership()` should return `173`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler131(), 173);
assert.strictEqual(primeCubePartnership(), 173);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler131(), 173);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler131() {
function primeCubePartnership() {
return true;
}
euler131();
primeCubePartnership();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,18 +8,18 @@ dashedName: problem-132-large-repunit-factors
# --description--
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define R(k) to be a repunit of length k.
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define $R(k)$ to be a repunit of length $k$.
For example, R(10) = 1111111111 = 11×41×271×9091, and the sum of these prime factors is 9414.
For example, $R(10) = 1111111111 = 11 × 41 × 271 × 9091$, and the sum of these prime factors is 9414.
Find the sum of the first forty prime factors of R(109).
Find the sum of the first forty prime factors of $R({10}^9)$.
# --hints--
`euler132()` should return 843296.
`largeRepunitFactors()` should return `843296`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler132(), 843296);
assert.strictEqual(largeRepunitFactors(), 843296);
```
# --seed--
@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler132(), 843296);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler132() {
function largeRepunitFactors() {
return true;
}
euler132();
largeRepunitFactors();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ dashedName: problem-133-repunit-nonfactors
# --description--
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define R(k) to be a repunit of length k; for example, R(6) = 111111.
A number consisting entirely of ones is called a repunit. We shall define $R(k)$ to be a repunit of length $k$; for example, $R(6) = 111111$.
Let us consider repunits of the form R(10n).
Let us consider repunits of the form $R({10}^n)$.
Although R(10), R(100), or R(1000) are not divisible by 17, R(10000) is divisible by 17. Yet there is no value of n for which R(10n) will divide by 19. In fact, it is remarkable that 11, 17, 41, and 73 are the only four primes below one-hundred that can be a factor of R(10n).
Although $R(10)$, $R(100)$, or $R(1000)$ are not divisible by 17, $R(10000)$ is divisible by 17. Yet there is no value of n for which $R({10}^n)$ will divide by 19. Remarkably, 11, 17, 41, and 73 are the only four primes below one-hundred that can be a factor of $R({10}^n)$.
Find the sum of all the primes below one-hundred thousand that will never be a factor of R(10n).
Find the sum of all the primes below one-hundred thousand that will never be a factor of $R({10}^n)$.
# --hints--
`euler133()` should return 453647705.
`repunitNonfactors()` should return `453647705`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler133(), 453647705);
assert.strictEqual(repunitNonfactors(), 453647705);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler133(), 453647705);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler133() {
function repunitNonfactors() {
return true;
}
euler133();
repunitNonfactors();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,18 +8,18 @@ dashedName: problem-134-prime-pair-connection
# --description--
Consider the consecutive primes p1 = 19 and p2 = 23. It can be verified that 1219 is the smallest number such that the last digits are formed by p1 whilst also being divisible by p2.
Consider the consecutive primes $p_1 = 19$ and $p_2 = 23$. It can be verified that 1219 is the smallest number such that the last digits are formed by $p_1$ whilst also being divisible by $p_2$.
In fact, with the exception of p1 = 3 and p2 = 5, for every pair of consecutive primes, p2 > p1, there exist values of n for which the last digits are formed by p1 and n is divisible by p2. Let S be the smallest of these values of n.
In fact, with the exception of $p_1 = 3$ and $p_2 = 5$, for every pair of consecutive primes, $p_2 > p_1$, there exist values of $n$ for which the last digits are formed by $p_1$ and $n$ is divisible by $p_2$. Let $S$ be the smallest of these values of $n$.
Find ∑ S for every pair of consecutive primes with 5 ≤ p1 ≤ 1000000.
Find $\sum{S}$ for every pair of consecutive primes with $5 ≤ p_1 ≤ 1000000$.
# --hints--
`euler134()` should return 18613426663617120.
`primePairConnection()` should return `18613426663617120`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler134(), 18613426663617120);
assert.strictEqual(primePairConnection(), 18613426663617120);
```
# --seed--
@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler134(), 18613426663617120);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler134() {
function primePairConnection() {
return true;
}
euler134();
primePairConnection();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ dashedName: problem-135-same-differences
# --description--
Given the positive integers, x, y, and z, are consecutive terms of an arithmetic progression, the least value of the positive integer, n, for which the equation, x2 y2 z2 = n, has exactly two solutions is n = 27:
Given the positive integers, $x$, $y$, and $z$, are consecutive terms of an arithmetic progression, the least value of the positive integer, $n$, for which the equation, $x^2 y^2 z^2 = n$, has exactly two solutions is $n = 27$:
342 272 202 = 122 92 62 = 27
$$34^2 27^2 20^2 = 12^2 9^2 6^2 = 27$$
It turns out that n = 1155 is the least value which has exactly ten solutions.
It turns out that $n = 1155$ is the least value which has exactly ten solutions.
How many values of n less than one million have exactly ten distinct solutions?
How many values of $n$ less than one million have exactly ten distinct solutions?
# --hints--
`euler135()` should return 4989.
`sameDifferences()` should return `4989`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler135(), 4989);
assert.strictEqual(sameDifferences(), 4989);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler135(), 4989);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler135() {
function sameDifferences() {
return true;
}
euler135();
sameDifferences();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,20 +8,20 @@ dashedName: problem-136-singleton-difference
# --description--
The positive integers, x, y, and z, are consecutive terms of an arithmetic progression. Given that n is a positive integer, the equation, x2 y2 z2 = n, has exactly one solution when n = 20:
The positive integers, $x$, $y$, and $z$, are consecutive terms of an arithmetic progression. Given that $n$ is a positive integer, the equation, $x^2 y^2 z^2 = n$, has exactly one solution when $n = 20$:
132 102 72 = 20
$$13^2 10^2 7^2 = 20$$
In fact there are twenty-five values of n below one hundred for which the equation has a unique solution.
In fact, there are twenty-five values of $n$ below one hundred for which the equation has a unique solution.
How many values of n less than fifty million have exactly one solution?
How many values of $n$ less than fifty million have exactly one solution?
# --hints--
`euler136()` should return 2544559.
`singletonDifference()` should return `2544559`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler136(), 2544559);
assert.strictEqual(singletonDifference(), 2544559);
```
# --seed--
@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler136(), 2544559);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler136() {
function singletonDifference() {
return true;
}
euler136();
singletonDifference();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,30 +8,38 @@ dashedName: problem-137-fibonacci-golden-nuggets
# --description--
Consider the infinite polynomial series AF(x) = xF1 + x2F2 + x3F3 + ..., where Fk is the kth term in the Fibonacci sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, ... ; that is, Fk = Fk1 + Fk2, F1 = 1 and F2 = 1.
Consider the infinite polynomial series $A_{F}(x) = xF_1 + x^2F_2 + x^3F_3 + \ldots$, where $F_k$ is the $k$th term in the Fibonacci sequence: $1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, \ldots$; that is, $F_k = F_{k 1} + F_{k 2}, F_1 = 1$ and $F_2 = 1$.
For this problem we shall be interested in values of x for which AF(x) is a positive integer.
For this problem we shall be interested in values of $x$ for which $A_{F}(x)$ is a positive integer.
Surprisingly AF(1/2)
Surprisingly
=
$$\begin{align}
A_F(\frac{1}{2}) & = (\frac{1}{2}) × 1 + {(\frac{1}{2})}^2 × 1 + {(\frac{1}{2})}^3 × 2 + {(\frac{1}{2})}^4 × 3 + {(\frac{1}{2})}^5 × 5 + \cdots \\\\
& = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{2}{8} + \frac{3}{16} + \frac{5}{32} + \cdots \\\\
& = 2
\end{align}$$
(1/2).1 + (1/2)2.1 + (1/2)3.2 + (1/2)4.3 + (1/2)5.5 + ...
The corresponding values of $x$ for the first five natural numbers are shown below.
= 1/2 + 1/4 + 2/8 + 3/16 + 5/32 + ...
| $x$ | $A_F(x)$ |
|---------------------------|----------|
| $\sqrt{2} 1$ | $1$ |
| $\frac{1}{2}$ | $2$ |
| $\frac{\sqrt{13} 2}{3}$ | $3$ |
| $\frac{\sqrt{89} 5}{8}$ | $4$ |
| $\frac{\sqrt{34} 3}{5}$ | $5$ |
= 2 The corresponding values of x for the first five natural numbers are shown below.
We shall call $A_F(x)$ a golden nugget if $x$ is rational, because they become increasingly rarer; for example, the 10th golden nugget is 74049690.
xAF(x) √211 1/22 (√132)/33 (√895)/84 (√343)/55
We shall call AF(x) a golden nugget if x is rational, because they become increasingly rarer; for example, the 10th golden nugget is 74049690. Find the 15th golden nugget.
Find the 15th golden nugget.
# --hints--
`euler137()` should return 1120149658760.
`goldenNugget()` should return `1120149658760`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler137(), 1120149658760);
assert.strictEqual(goldenNugget(), 1120149658760);
```
# --seed--
@ -39,12 +47,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler137(), 1120149658760);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler137() {
function goldenNugget() {
return true;
}
euler137();
goldenNugget();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,16 +8,22 @@ dashedName: problem-138-special-isosceles-triangles
# --description--
Consider the isosceles triangle with base length, b = 16, and legs, L = 17.
Consider the isosceles triangle with base length, $b = 16$, and legs, $L = 17$.
By using the Pythagorean theorem it can be seen that the height of the triangle, h = √(172 82) = 15, which is one less than the base length. With b = 272 and L = 305, we get h = 273, which is one more than the base length, and this is the second smallest isosceles triangle with the property that h = b ± 1. Find ∑ L for the twelve smallest isosceles triangles for which h = b ± 1 and b, L are positive integers.
<img class="img-responsive center-block" alt="isosceles triangle with edges named as L - two edges with the same length and base of the triangle as b; and height of the triangle - h from the base of the triangle to the angle between L edges" src="https://cdn.freecodecamp.org/curriculum/project-euler/special-isosceles-triangles.png" style="background-color: white; padding: 10px;">
By using the Pythagorean theorem, it can be seen that the height of the triangle, $h = \sqrt{{17}^2 8^2} = 15$, which is one less than the base length.
With $b = 272$ and $L = 305$, we get $h = 273$, which is one more than the base length, and this is the second smallest isosceles triangle with the property that $h = b ± 1$.
Find $\sum{L}$ for the twelve smallest isosceles triangles for which $h = b ± 1$ and $b$, $L$ are positive integers.
# --hints--
`euler138()` should return 1118049290473932.
`isoscelesTriangles()` should return `1118049290473932`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler138(), 1118049290473932);
assert.strictEqual(isoscelesTriangles(), 1118049290473932);
```
# --seed--
@ -25,12 +31,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler138(), 1118049290473932);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler138() {
function isoscelesTriangles() {
return true;
}
euler138();
isoscelesTriangles();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -12,14 +12,18 @@ Let (a, b, c) represent the three sides of a right angle triangle with integral
For example, (3, 4, 5) triangles can be placed together to form a 5 by 5 square with a 1 by 1 hole in the middle and it can be seen that the 5 by 5 square can be tiled with twenty-five 1 by 1 squares.
However, if (5, 12, 13) triangles were used then the hole would measure 7 by 7 and these could not be used to tile the 13 by 13 square. Given that the perimeter of the right triangle is less than one-hundred million, how many Pythagorean triangles would allow such a tiling to take place?
<img class="img-responsive center-block" alt="two 5 x 5 squares: one with four 3x4x5 triangles placed to create 1x1 hole in the middle; second with twenty-five 1x1 squares" src="https://cdn.freecodecamp.org/curriculum/project-euler/pythagorean-tiles.png" style="background-color: white; padding: 10px;">
However, if (5, 12, 13) triangles were used, the hole would measure 7 by 7. These 7 by 7 squares could not be used to tile the 13 by 13 square.
Given that the perimeter of the right triangle is less than one-hundred million, how many Pythagorean triangles would allow such a tiling to occur?
# --hints--
`euler139()` should return 10057761.
`pythagoreanTiles()` should return `10057761`.
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler139(), 10057761);
assert.strictEqual(pythagoreanTiles(), 10057761);
```
# --seed--
@ -27,12 +31,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler139(), 10057761);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler139() {
function pythagoreanTiles() {
return true;
}
euler139();
pythagoreanTiles();
```
# --solutions--

View File

@ -8,22 +8,28 @@ dashedName: problem-140-modified-fibonacci-golden-nuggets
# --description--
Consider the infinite polynomial series AG(x) = xG1 + x2G2 + x3G3 + ..., where Gk is the kth term of the second order recurrence relation Gk = Gk1 + Gk2, G1 = 1 and G2 = 4; that is, 1, 4, 5, 9, 14, 23, ... .
Consider the infinite polynomial series $A_G(x) = xG_1 + x^2G_2 + x^3G_3 + \cdots$, where $G_k$ is the $k$th term of the second order recurrence relation $G_k = G_{k 1} + G_{k 2}, G_1 = 1$ and $G_2 = 4$; that is, $1, 4, 5, 9, 14, 23, \ldots$.
For this problem we shall be concerned with values of x for which AG(x) is a positive integer.
For this problem we shall be concerned with values of $x$ for which $A_G(x)$ is a positive integer.
The corresponding values of x for the first five natural numbers are shown below.
The corresponding values of $x$ for the first five natural numbers are shown below.
xAG(x) (√51)/41 2/52 (√222)/63 (√1375)/144 1/25
| $x$ | $A_G(x)$ |
|-----------------------------|----------|
| $\frac{\sqrt{5} 1}{4}$ | $1$ |
| $\frac{2}{5}$ | $2$ |
| $\frac{\sqrt{22} 2}{6}$ | $3$ |
| $\frac{\sqrt{137} 5}{14}$ | $4$ |
| $\frac{1}{2}$ | $5$ |
We shall call AG(x) a golden nugget if x is rational, because they become increasingly rarer; for example, the 20th golden nugget is 211345365. Find the sum of the first thirty golden nuggets.
We shall call $A_G(x)$ a golden nugget if $x$ is rational because they become increasingly rarer; for example, the 20th golden nugget is 211345365. Find the sum of the first thirty golden nuggets.
# --hints--
`euler140()` should return 5673835352990.
`modifiedGoldenNuggets()` should return `5673835352990`
```js
assert.strictEqual(euler140(), 5673835352990);
assert.strictEqual(modifiedGoldenNuggets(), 5673835352990);
```
# --seed--
@ -31,12 +37,12 @@ assert.strictEqual(euler140(), 5673835352990);
## --seed-contents--
```js
function euler140() {
function modifiedGoldenNuggets() {
return true;
}
euler140();
modifiedGoldenNuggets();
```
# --solutions--