* fix: clean-up Project Euler 141-160 * fix: corrections from review Co-authored-by: Sem Bauke <46919888+Sembauke@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: corrections from review Co-authored-by: Tom <20648924+moT01@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: use different notation for consistency * Update curriculum/challenges/english/10-coding-interview-prep/project-euler/problem-144-investigating-multiple-reflections-of-a-laser-beam.md Co-authored-by: gikf <60067306+gikf@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sem Bauke <46919888+Sembauke@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tom <20648924+moT01@users.noreply.github.com>
43 lines
977 B
Markdown
43 lines
977 B
Markdown
---
|
|
id: 5900f3fd1000cf542c50ff10
|
|
title: 'Problem 145: How many reversible numbers are there below one-billion?'
|
|
challengeType: 5
|
|
forumTopicId: 301774
|
|
dashedName: problem-145-how-many-reversible-numbers-are-there-below-one-billion
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# --description--
|
|
|
|
Some positive integers $n$ have the property that the sum [ $n + reverse(n)$ ] consists entirely of odd (decimal) digits. For instance, $36 + 63 = 99$ and $409 + 904 = 1313$. We will call such numbers reversible; so 36, 63, 409, and 904 are reversible. Leading zeroes are not allowed in either $n$ or $reverse(n)$.
|
|
|
|
There are 120 reversible numbers below one-thousand.
|
|
|
|
How many reversible numbers are there below one-billion (${10}^9$)?
|
|
|
|
# --hints--
|
|
|
|
`reversibleNumbers()` should return `608720`.
|
|
|
|
```js
|
|
assert.strictEqual(reversibleNumbers(), 608720);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
# --seed--
|
|
|
|
## --seed-contents--
|
|
|
|
```js
|
|
function reversibleNumbers() {
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
reversibleNumbers();
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
# --solutions--
|
|
|
|
```js
|
|
// solution required
|
|
```
|